From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by ms11 with LMTPS
	id GCVnBmiSdl/pMgAA0tVLHw
	(envelope-from <bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 02:37:28 +0000
Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by mp1 with LMTPS
	id CJ0mAmiSdl/qewAAbx9fmQ
	(envelope-from <bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 02:37:28 +0000
Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4783D940223
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Fri,  2 Oct 2020 02:37:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost ([::1]:47810 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1kOAwo-0007Ls-2f
	for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 22:37:26 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37512)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1kOAwR-0007GV-Nb
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 22:37:04 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55547)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1kOAwQ-0001Y3-LC
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 22:37:03 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1kOAwQ-0000qy-JQ
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 22:37:02 -0400
X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org
Subject: bug#43738: Patch file names too long
Resent-From: Brett Gilio <brettg@gnu.org>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org
Resent-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2020 02:37:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.43738.B43738.16016062143257@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43738
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: easy
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Received: via spool by 43738-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43738.16016062143257
 (code B ref 43738); Fri, 02 Oct 2020 02:37:02 +0000
Received: (at 43738) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Oct 2020 02:36:54 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38859 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1kOAwI-0000qT-H2
 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 22:36:54 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58870)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <brettg@gnu.org>) id 1kOAwG-0000qE-QV
 for 43738@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 22:36:53 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38707)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <brettg@gnu.org>)
 id 1kOAwA-0001XQ-Rq; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 22:36:46 -0400
Received: from [2605:6000:1a0d:48fb::8e5] (port=58200 helo=debian)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <brettg@gnu.org>)
 id 1kOAwA-0002lk-Au; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 22:36:46 -0400
From: Brett Gilio <brettg@gnu.org>
References: <87a6x6utrj.fsf@gnu.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 21:36:44 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87a6x6utrj.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?="'s
 message of "Thu, 01 Oct 2020 12:26:24 +0200")
Message-ID: <87tuvdxsjn.fsf@debian>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)
X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: 43738@debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>
X-Scanner: scn0
Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com;
	dkim=none;
	dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org;
	spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.49
X-TUID: 7ZbfQu9T1PLl

Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> There are several patch file names that are too long for =E2=80=98tar=E2=
=80=99, as
> reported during =E2=80=98make dist=E2=80=99:
>
> tar: guix-1.0.1.22624-c258f1-dirty/gnu/packages/patches/ocaml-bisect-fix-=
camlp4-in-another-directory.patch dosiernomo tro longas (maks 99); ne =C5=
=9Dutita
> tar: guix-1.0.1.22624-c258f1-dirty/gnu/packages/patches/audiofile-signatu=
re-of-multiplyCheckOverflow.patch dosiernomo tro longas (maks 99); ne =C5=
=9Dutita
> tar: guix-1.0.1.22624-c258f1-dirty/gnu/packages/patches/python2-pygobject=
-2-gi-info-type-error-domain.patch dosiernomo tro longas (maks 99); ne =C5=
=9Dutita
> tar: guix-1.0.1.22624-c258f1-dirty/gnu/packages/patches/audiofile-divisio=
n-by-zero-BlockCodec-runPull.patch dosiernomo tro longas (maks 99); ne =C5=
=9Dutita
> tar: guix-1.0.1.22624-c258f1-dirty/gnu/packages/patches/python-robotframe=
work-honor-source-date-epoch.patch dosiernomo tro longas (maks 99); ne =C5=
=9Dutita
>
> =E2=80=98guix lint=E2=80=99 reports it as well, but apparently this is ea=
sily
> overlooked.
>
> Ludo=E2=80=99.

Does it matter that this is coming from a dirty working tree? Maybe not.

Brett Gilio