From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by ms11 with LMTPS
	id 6HeqGO4+eF9EMwAA0tVLHw
	(envelope-from <bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Sat, 03 Oct 2020 09:05:50 +0000
Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by mp0 with LMTPS
	id WAVcFO4+eF8xHgAA1q6Kng
	(envelope-from <bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Sat, 03 Oct 2020 09:05:50 +0000
Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE2CD9404C2
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Sat,  3 Oct 2020 09:05:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost ([::1]:38352 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1kOdUC-0002XK-Sq
	for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2020 05:05:48 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33128)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1kOdSU-0000Dv-BU
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2020 05:04:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59655)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1kOdSU-0005Yc-1A
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2020 05:04:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1kOdST-00028w-Sd
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2020 05:04:01 -0400
X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org
Subject: bug#43738: Patch file names too long
Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org
Resent-Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2020 09:04:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.43738.B43738.16017157968183@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43738
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: easy
To: Brett Gilio <brettg@gnu.org>
Received: via spool by 43738-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43738.16017157968183
 (code B ref 43738); Sat, 03 Oct 2020 09:04:01 +0000
Received: (at 43738) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Oct 2020 09:03:16 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42968 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1kOdRk-00027u-LF
 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2020 05:03:16 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54376)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1kOdRj-00027h-0N
 for 43738@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2020 05:03:15 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51930)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
 id 1kOdRd-0005Uv-OK; Sat, 03 Oct 2020 05:03:09 -0400
Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=43618 helo=ribbon)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
 id 1kOdRd-0001OB-CJ; Sat, 03 Oct 2020 05:03:09 -0400
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
References: <87a6x6utrj.fsf@gnu.org> <87tuvdxsjn.fsf@debian>
X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/
X-Revolutionary-Date: 12 =?UTF-8?Q?Vend=C3=A9miaire?= an 229 de la
 =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?=
X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5
X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4  0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5
X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2020 11:03:07 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87tuvdxsjn.fsf@debian> (Brett Gilio's message of "Thu, 01 Oct
 2020 21:36:44 -0500")
Message-ID: <87tuvbheb8.fsf@gnu.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---)
X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: 43738@debbugs.gnu.org
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>
X-Scanner: scn0
Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com;
	dkim=none;
	dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org;
	spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org
X-Spam-Score: -1.51
X-TUID: CWOfvZyvQ51f

Brett Gilio <brettg@gnu.org> skribis:

> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> There are several patch file names that are too long for =E2=80=98tar=E2=
=80=99, as
>> reported during =E2=80=98make dist=E2=80=99:
>>
>> tar: guix-1.0.1.22624-c258f1-dirty/gnu/packages/patches/ocaml-bisect-fix=
-camlp4-in-another-directory.patch dosiernomo tro longas (maks 99); ne =C5=
=9Dutita
>> tar: guix-1.0.1.22624-c258f1-dirty/gnu/packages/patches/audiofile-signat=
ure-of-multiplyCheckOverflow.patch dosiernomo tro longas (maks 99); ne =C5=
=9Dutita
>> tar: guix-1.0.1.22624-c258f1-dirty/gnu/packages/patches/python2-pygobjec=
t-2-gi-info-type-error-domain.patch dosiernomo tro longas (maks 99); ne =C5=
=9Dutita
>> tar: guix-1.0.1.22624-c258f1-dirty/gnu/packages/patches/audiofile-divisi=
on-by-zero-BlockCodec-runPull.patch dosiernomo tro longas (maks 99); ne =C5=
=9Dutita
>> tar: guix-1.0.1.22624-c258f1-dirty/gnu/packages/patches/python-robotfram=
ework-honor-source-date-epoch.patch dosiernomo tro longas (maks 99); ne =C5=
=9Dutita
>>
>> =E2=80=98guix lint=E2=80=99 reports it as well, but apparently this is e=
asily
>> overlooked.
>>
>> Ludo=E2=80=99.
>
> Does it matter that this is coming from a dirty working tree? Maybe not.

Nope, it doesn=E2=80=99t matter.

Ludo=E2=80=99.