From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 2DObA++j0F+oGQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 10:16:15 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id AIr+Ou6j0F/bawAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 10:16:14 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAD76940111 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 10:16:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:49020 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kmwW5-0001wA-QU for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 05:16:13 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39708) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kmwVu-0001vI-3Q for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 05:16:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49545) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kmwVt-0007wd-Ov for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 05:16:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kmwVt-0004Eh-K0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 05:16:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#45020] [PATCH 0/2] image: Add system field. Resent-From: Mathieu Othacehe Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 10:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45020 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Efraim Flashner Cc: dannym@scratchpost.org, 45020@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 45020-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45020.160750894216256 (code B ref 45020); Wed, 09 Dec 2020 10:16:01 +0000 Received: (at 45020) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Dec 2020 10:15:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32858 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kmwVa-0004E8-Fn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 05:15:42 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46504) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kmwVX-0004Du-Uq for 45020@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 05:15:40 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43437) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kmwVS-0007nY-6d; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 05:15:34 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:19b:d9a0:e14f:e746:85df:3f38] (port=52506 helo=cervin) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kmwVR-0006Th-Qh; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 05:15:34 -0500 From: Mathieu Othacehe References: <20201203105353.149482-1-othacehe@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 11:15:32 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Efraim Flashner's message of "Wed, 9 Dec 2020 10:25:56 +0200") Message-ID: <87tusvz3nf.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.81 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: CAD76940111 X-Spam-Score: -1.81 X-Migadu-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu X-TUID: lwdtB7JLb13W Hello Efraim, > I'm not sure about i686-linux being an efi-raw type. I always assumed > they were all not EFI. The "efi-raw" image type is actually an hybrid image type supporting EFI and BIOS legacy boot methods. Maybe we should then rename "raw" to "bios-efi-raw" or "bios-efi-hybrid-raw", what do you think? Thanks, Mathieu