From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id CBSdLeQMQmAgNQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 10:50:12 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id jiF0KeQMQmDWOQAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 10:50:12 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D510512FE4 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 11:50:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43396 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lI826-0004TG-NW for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 05:50:10 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51796) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lI81y-0004Sd-Gx for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 05:50:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49647) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lI81y-0006Pw-7d for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 05:50:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lI81y-0002tx-6S for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 05:50:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#46829: Fresh install of 1.2.0 can't guix pull Resent-From: Christopher Baines Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 10:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46829 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: zimoun Received: via spool by 46829-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46829.161494135111066 (code B ref 46829); Fri, 05 Mar 2021 10:50:02 +0000 Received: (at 46829) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Mar 2021 10:49:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32956 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lI819-0002sQ-5w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 05:49:11 -0500 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([212.71.252.8]:35062) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lI817-0002sI-Gt for 46829@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 05:49:10 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8010:68c1:0:8ac0:b4c7:f5c8:7caa]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 68EB827BC4F; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 10:49:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from capella (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 9e9f70b0; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 10:49:07 +0000 (UTC) References: <871rd0ebd5.fsf@cbaines.net> <86r1kzyzj9.fsf@gmail.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.15; emacs 27.1 From: Christopher Baines In-reply-to: <86r1kzyzj9.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 10:49:04 +0000 Message-ID: <87tuppnae7.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 46829@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.46 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: D510512FE4 X-Spam-Score: -4.46 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: Af3xOBnfUNpt --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain zimoun writes: > Hi Chris, > > On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 at 10:27, Christopher Baines wrote: >> I believe there's TLS issues with pulling for the current 1.2.0 >> release. > > Is this bug different from ? > > And fixes are also discussed here: > . Yes, this bug is about a problem with guix pull, whereas #44559 relates to a specific issue building the gnutls package. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKlBAEBCgCPFiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAmBCDKBfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcRHG1haWxAY2Jh aW5lcy5uZXQACgkQXiijOwuE9XdG+hAAsOUm8Yfw1MD2m0oei0pLmVHB/+TwbCWW S+ax0zUeHx3nP8NcPmj7qlOxq3bpvg78Uryp25fD7xiEsUwMcUzpQXjP/0x9o4O0 XChUV9jAAIJzGyF1QGrs28Mc0eqfzVrqLu6gYj8SnKbKD8Rpdd5kuw/luyTCvC9j ZXe4TRLdFh8bHLMxyAedtBWssHTbzyo/f+xLciOxueA26kj+WOGCKiper/ujJ7GH rvVoniCBelr7GzP5boWXxvGX91c1dZAt254nvcPtSc1ZL61sViYgZNT3lqZuNPHd GwtfQim5XVP1dd8QdSrF0p3FL2fSmKH/vbCz2mVRUpQ/+8VDZaAI23GxdIU4XNtm IX6riHYN59qDTIk9wl5cE+GyndTWE5H2Edubx06XcNLrYiuKZiGht+q4SAjeBBid hz2BmqHjQJ51AV6wjyit583rch+7q/7g8c3rTuFjveSo6i1WpecLNIyMW4neAtVD 0w/AzJnO4TJzfp35zQKKPMwAM0v+97531x/MPxMdnMPSZAHzxkPRROZtOX3rurfD knNh/Q0wVHw68/QBp6EYcnW0eJCiyQfdxUhEG69uj1GOZkDS7H9JVsi8E2TDssEk VKAC1uap5THjAIPdCWYR9uMUqFDeddhFDh7dp0nL3dsufK4F6muenPvIsWkOrlGw WILE1i7+Sik= =Poyg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--