From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS
	id wIrdDoL9qWH4BgAAgWs5BA
	(envelope-from <guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Fri, 03 Dec 2021 12:20:34 +0100
Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by mp2 with LMTPS
	id cCqmCoL9qWFYKQAAB5/wlQ
	(envelope-from <guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Fri, 03 Dec 2021 11:20:34 +0000
Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04140AF3
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Fri,  3 Dec 2021 12:20:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost ([::1]:36254 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1mt6cD-00023W-4e
	for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2021 06:20:33 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58438)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>)
 id 1mt6bz-000235-50
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2021 06:20:19 -0500
Received: from sender4-of-o51.zoho.com ([136.143.188.51]:21102)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>)
 id 1mt6bq-0008An-By; Fri, 03 Dec 2021 06:20:13 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1638530404; cv=none; 
 d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; 
 b=iEWt4eoQu4FTOTloetU6gfEiQ0WJW0qip8IH3RP9t/sOicy5QPPJBd9PDrBG11M9IiiqhWaXvCm78002wtz6zwlSCzyuopr82A/DIng4bEh9PMoJmSZIVjo/nFoQl0SSEnaTiITUdJpx+gamBm/UNtsHi/Tagupv20QLWCaB71E=
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com;
 s=zohoarc; t=1638530404;
 h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To;
 bh=+bmkJbgrQdb4iMzkmXi8PXca6qz5BHhmN0wN5FMleD8=; 
 b=FXRjqrmzEh7Y37kemPZnnhQw43LGYYh266xEzlAvsVFenGhRopJDGl4yqsdSX04J8qiGoWrUdsj7s0lLiASIGn1ZWGGP8PRfVTAXu9RqSMTU9OQMQdaoFPuqvde8MDtSBJGfIldf1zbyZnogqd8o6EJ0aUFRBbS38vBZ1/ZxNX8=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com;
 dkim=pass  header.i=elephly.net;
 spf=pass  smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net;
 dmarc=pass header.from=<rekado@elephly.net>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1638530404; 
 s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net;
 h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-reply-to:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
 bh=+bmkJbgrQdb4iMzkmXi8PXca6qz5BHhmN0wN5FMleD8=;
 b=PP6w9w/68N6L6uaBOjDGm7//SLow7tFTh50iaf3YgW2A9LWF7q/woZ04RZLEaRa0
 RqMSym1Snh7rZYGbBhq79941j65OrN48RtM0Fn5LzUI9I/O9b4RB/P6WM4tkwzVTqr7
 JdFnmQ20DR5i1KO9jQ2mJ68+/CCDgpUsg4fI/DLo=
Received: from localhost (p54ad4883.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.72.131]) by
 mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1638530399735847.7271943127374;
 Fri, 3 Dec 2021 03:19:59 -0800 (PST)
References: <87ee762at1.fsf@cbaines.net> <8735ngb39u.fsf@gnu.org>
 <8735ngnjfc.fsf@elephly.net> <87fsra0yzs.fsf@cbaines.net>
User-agent: mu4e 1.6.6; emacs 27.2
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
To: Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net>
Subject: Re: Update on bordeaux.guix.gnu.org
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2021 11:18:18 +0000
In-reply-to: <87fsra0yzs.fsf@cbaines.net>
X-URL: https://elephly.net
X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey
X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6  2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
Message-ID: <87tufqx7dw.fsf@elephly.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-ZohoMailClient: External
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=136.143.188.51; envelope-from=rekado@elephly.net;
 helo=sender4-of-o51.zoho.com
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>
X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN
X-Migadu-Country: US
ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org;
	s=key1; t=1638530434;
	h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:
	 message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:
	 content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help:
	 list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature;
	bh=+bmkJbgrQdb4iMzkmXi8PXca6qz5BHhmN0wN5FMleD8=;
	b=uoGQTXoZkjMPL1es7Ik5rgetEvk4w/f2XT73UcjTOyTEf+gacZ604v2RnOz/FeQOelpjZf
	nbfMqkiGqyXK3Q6ObVMHMfHY138nmj9wtGQSnEocq6tR4lCXMTCox+f1OcTx3ebT4KlGZW
	0nK4sJ06Vj+gqmvYmIKDFvmoV3keut0iQJJ2SQdBpTQMCsQa0Zcwzwqni91Lr2rcpmWxin
	s2mxAkSYcCIy4RA3Ty08RNt2Ulg6YlHZJyjskhgNSzXvm1af6zpfZNU6neKZpX5d/4gpvp
	OLa+gX5vnO4+EUKOkur4Dvdq6HCHWEsc4/ZO+XS++0cKLRgyZYaE/Y05E43A3Q==
ARC-Seal: i=2; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1638530434; a=rsa-sha256; cv=fail;
	b=fCOwIgDriHK/wrKyfPCn3ba+TT9O6DT6JBT++/vPG0OE54drdy1oglyQhceV1upWwPm9wR
	oDShcRrRCrMRJsQxqF1Heseybimn4jf0Y2kNO7XweGVsOYlV0UbtlEHmbi3MuUs1MBmz7y
	XXVUqXQROHSxBCYoyc6MF6QKPWTCWuLG7ku8+2PdJeivMIIa7iSUm0f0Cg2Yb44+kTxq5c
	yckuSjYKKVSPCSXRqQF2f09fGT0uP30pbq7+Uj357J9X2GPiS/JCbCdWw/iKP0ZG72R3qv
	qJCuWfePheXWVpuhQBG0Hd9TIzKl6ddmMAV3StDRdTJzRniopdez6vLuQzAmdw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2;
	aspmx1.migadu.com;
	dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=elephly.net header.s=zoho header.b="PP6w9w/6";
	arc=reject ("signature check failed: fail, {[1] = sig:zohomail.com:reject}");
	dmarc=none;
	spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"
X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -0.92
Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com;
	dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=elephly.net header.s=zoho header.b="PP6w9w/6";
	arc=reject ("signature check failed: fail, {[1] = sig:zohomail.com:reject}");
	dmarc=none;
	spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"
X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 04140AF3
X-Spam-Score: -0.92
X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com
X-TUID: Nu/Qut1kZEFF


Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> writes:

> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
>
> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
>
>> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>>
>>>> The disk space usage trend is pretty much
>>>> linear, so if things continue without any change, I think it will
>>>> be
>>>> necessary to pause the agents within a month, to avoid filling up
>>>> bayfront entirely.
>>>
>>> Ah, bummer.  I hope we can find a solution one way or another.
>>> Certainly we could replicate nars on another machine with more disk,
>>> possibly buying the necessary hardware with the project funds.
>>
>> Remember that I=E2=80=99ve got three 256G SSDs here that I could send to
>> wherever bayfront now sits.  With LLVM or a RAID configuration
>> these could just be added to the storage pool =E2=80=94 if bayfront has
>> sufficient slots for three more disks.
>
> While it would be nice for bayfront to have an SSD, it might actually be
> more valuable to use those for some of the machines that do more of the
> building.
>
> harbourfront currently has a broken hard drive (I believe), and
> milano-guix-1 has some slow hard drives that impede it building
> things. I've CC'ed Andreas as I think he knows more about harbourfront,
> and I'll follow up about milano-guix-1 off list.

Okay, thank you.

Note that these disks are (nominally) 250G each.  The spinning platter
disks might be larger than that, so this should be taken into account
when replacing disks.

--=20
Ricardo