From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id eHRlHGH/R2SY5gAASxT56A (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 18:27:13 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id YPxPHGH/R2T6cQEAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 18:27:13 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39B938B7E for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 18:27:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1prLVN-0004Rz-8e; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 12:27:01 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1prLVL-0004Rb-I7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 12:26:59 -0400 Received: from jpoiret.xyz ([206.189.101.64]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1prLVJ-0006bZ-TE for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 12:26:59 -0400 Received: from authenticated-user (jpoiret.xyz [206.189.101.64]) by jpoiret.xyz (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 381471852FF; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 16:26:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jpoiret.xyz; s=dkim; t=1682440015; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=WKCG47EAZRY1/p3NxAkQqvuWBVBgzHnrzEfQU0F7VxU=; b=uQJjnK3yF8VC0oCmfKgwiwgLdYEuKksr0wIgU6AfENuHfK+6WjaVOqHYP+gxhZlk75nOO9 V3kED5WgSkKu2D73K0d5x+Vx7iNtX34YLH5LZ8R2399Z2M6j34q4fSUzZT24bz2SkxOsOh CM+HulMUJW25dQsP09OUnJkzxuQDH0+T6Dv6lDXCrQZcu3uUDGvdI06ku0LxHBNOGxd7G/ 8SWqYP/SDkGiyvaWm8kEzDItJDCcXZqSxZQW/ADBy+ShUNmewK1MeZ2oko6ITO9m5txgZA VucnOlRWtWORrJrTvblcQDO0va/POqnOvUL288crl02wLYrUuIPg7wfIBZTLCA== From: Josselin Poiret To: Arun Isaac , guix-devel@gnu.org Cc: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: `mumi send-email' means no more debbugs dance to send multiple patches In-Reply-To: <874jp4i1vu.fsf@systemreboot.net> References: <87mt2xiab3.fsf@systemreboot.net> <87leihujq7.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> <874jp4i1vu.fsf@systemreboot.net> Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 18:26:52 +0200 Message-ID: <87ttx4rkqb.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spamd-Bar: / Received-SPF: pass client-ip=206.189.101.64; envelope-from=dev@jpoiret.xyz; helo=jpoiret.xyz X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1682440033; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Adf1GqKtLvyBKOeyEjIgvk3t1gVJ9nAunCFyFHHQkQsFbLUm+wxB+iQSop8FbXw1cg91/I 0o/Zdy9XUQ4A3jzpvFhUF4z1Wl4p4ZE0uUBV0kVUQg5yrR+ik0ZLM9WGMDNoukH41/rlso OoiRkJSFs1fNPO5yMxNbekFa6zI626HvGKZvMyL0FWhHkzsZI+SRpH4POmKnKkhu41MFQ/ af39hVCY8beDj05z2PhwrMuDD7352eWHRNcb2sqWDqApfCAaV6tsZF947wgrCWmJy19EAr Ui7Y/zpG4OXFW0WyvVLu7DSgd23Tyf4Hh+kpcrOdxL0JfAP9++F8bzya1zsRbQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=jpoiret.xyz header.s=dkim header.b=uQJjnK3y; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=jpoiret.xyz; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1682440033; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=WKCG47EAZRY1/p3NxAkQqvuWBVBgzHnrzEfQU0F7VxU=; b=WOk+CHzGl3GVqhajxrb8dBDRRSyi2BKy5LvkfuAWnMjrCg0n0Z/mkiyqDzRK93T+mhitYR NzmnkUvekEX4JC5LGOLYvHeKJKPTpExKmb7XculXrqDpeYGU/em1HgszgkoovIs578Gjsk 9Am9hDW6a3s+XMeMJPdpA3N31zr+D8sRiKyzEMogWDTofCKwjXLc8dptgsqcsDog3wEia2 EaIbTvHUG5Uge3ESPoVfNTNN9XFP5FAPcIDl2tCVALiZz4MBXv6LTv158DVuD+I2L4wuL0 sYLuLTkHWX37y2RnMWdfTIKlrOzyCJ0o5zW+C2y5PxxfDQKLV1gbL2G8tTpaOA== X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=jpoiret.xyz header.s=dkim header.b=uQJjnK3y; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=jpoiret.xyz; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -7.88 X-Spam-Score: -7.88 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 39B938B7E X-TUID: 8kPcEMV5YN8H --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Arun, Arun Isaac writes: > Hi Josselin, > > Ouch! Unfortunately, timeouts can happen. I was just hoping it would be > unlikely. Did you wait out the full 15 retries of `mumi send-email'? Yes, I did wait until it completely timed out. > This is admittedly a somewhat fragile system, but it is the best we can > do considering debbugs' limitations. Given email's asynchronous store > and forward design and all the polling we do, a `mumi send-email' > timeout is possible. Do you think increasing the number of times `mumi > send-email' retries would help? Did the email you sent using `mumi > send-email' finally reach debbugs and the mumi server? How long did it > take? How long do your emails typically take to reach debbugs and the > mumi server? My mails usually take less that 30 seconds to get a reply from debbugs. I don't remember how long it took yesterday for the issue to appear on mumi though, but more than the 15 retries of mumi send-email (I manually checked). > Thanks for the feedback, and happy hacking! :-) Thanks for your tool! Best, =2D-=20 Josselin Poiret --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQHEBAEBCAAuFiEEOSSM2EHGPMM23K8vUF5AuRYXGooFAmRH/0wQHGRldkBqcG9p cmV0Lnh5egAKCRBQXkC5FhcaivVbDACpDdG4d5wv+lIpgngyo8K6gCmMdJz0nmFr /efrsxMkVuS7r0OLusTIrZAPfhixp9/NuiV9/ZJ0SCBe6svtNbWwaGtNYhlGWsZL nkAB29b810MmWW9z1tqTafAn2BZgj9sqI3a84wHNIYSEfr6kR1CWIDWfWDSD81ti qr2QxQeILVRuo9mPcyImru9O3jTFyjezwAIVy5OsRHe6N8yGBcSHYIspF7t8aead ZQf+C+muJWaBR85YdzeOSXQ3prTT3g1uk7zkE6iYmVov+s/vaDbCKeq5QjL1jc42 8Aj529n3D72vJrNfO4kqXQUAQL3NHHuJ4DJ2x89TkXMbFL6o1C3I4hjpL2nOt81t ZWY2kxB37lFwbH/pR9tm1Kp+cPkfWxF9FJ4rlxiMsshcMQvilVgSfFbSWPSffAx7 L3fnDVCOUPrvVUmevs6Pv5OZt9qnu4mfyGRUDQL3XhuVfzyfWEUdQjYMoIXoj6OS 4C8oPzI9w4opmVvC0o4XExrrNnFt3qI= =9g4w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--