From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Subject: Re: w3m: 'license'; error: redefinition of 'struct file_handle'
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 22:20:44 -0500
Message-ID: <87sj4zinsj.fsf@tines.lan>
References: <878v6spyx3.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87y5esk9s6.fsf@tines.lan>
	<201302131143.06301.andreas@enge.fr> <874nhfkhcl.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57031)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mhw@netris.org>) id 1U5pNi-0007GE-FK
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 22:21:08 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mhw@netris.org>) id 1U5pNb-0005CX-Oq
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 22:21:06 -0500
In-Reply-To: <874nhfkhcl.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\=
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Wed, 13 Feb 2013 22:56:58 +0100")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org

ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes:

> Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:
>
>> Additionally, the file matrix.c looks non-free to me:
>> "3.  No charge is made for this software or works derived from it.=20=20
>>       This clause shall not be construed as constraining other software
>>       distributed on the same medium as this software, nor is a
>>       distribution fee considered a charge."
>>
>> So maybe it needs to be patched out, if possible? How come debian contai=
ns=20
>> the file?
>
> It=E2=80=99s not in http://libreplanet.org/wiki/Software_blacklist so I g=
uess
> it=E2=80=99s a question for the gnu-linux-libre mailing list.  Any volunt=
eer?

I'll ask RMS and report back.  The only reason I'm not certain it's
non-free is because of the words "nor is a distribution fee considered a
charge."

   Thanks,
     Mark