From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 13:21:14 +0200
Message-ID: <87siwibnx1.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20131002124146.GA15506@debian> <20131002180223.GA873@debian>
	<874n8zsc3c.fsf@gnu.org> <20131002205600.GA1680@debian>
	<87a9irpbb0.fsf@gnu.org> <20131003110113.GA6327@debian>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54840)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1VRh31-0007A2-8a
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 07:26:29 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1VRh2u-0006Hb-3U
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 07:26:23 -0400
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:52610)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1VRh2t-0006HR-TT
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 07:26:16 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20131003110113.GA6327@debian> (Andreas Enge's message of "Thu, 3
	Oct 2013 13:01:13 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:

> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 12:17:39AM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:

[...]

>> What I had in mind is that upon installation in the user=E2=80=99s profi=
le, the
>> glib-compile-foobar command would be run for all the schema-providing
>> packages to appear in the new profile.
>
> This could even be done automatically without specifying it in the package
> description whenever a package contains a file in share/glib-2.0/schemas/.
> The glib-compile-schemas (there is also glib-compile-resources) is part of
> the glib package, so should be available as an input to such a package.
> But which glib version would we choose then when constructing the user
> profile? Different installed packages could have different glibs as input=
s,
> for instance. The one that is "current" in the sense that it would be
> installed by "guix package -i glib"?

Assuming the format is stable, we could just use the current glib.

If that=E2=80=99s not the case, we can always come up with a more sophistic=
ated
approach.

Ludo=E2=80=99.