From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: bug#20039: jack2: Dangling .so references
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 23:27:20 +0100
Message-ID: <87siddolh3.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <874mpvctyu.fsf@taylan.uni.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58168)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1YV69c-0005ee-2o
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 18:28:05 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1YV69a-0005lC-28
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 18:28:04 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42416)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1YV69Z-0005l8-W0
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 18:28:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1YV69Z-0000AC-NC
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 18:28:01 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.20039.B20039.1425940050579@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <874mpvctyu.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> ("Taylan Ulrich
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?\=5C\=22Bay\=C4\=B1rl\=C4\=B1\=2FKammer\=5C\=22\=22's\?\=
	message of "Sun, 08 Mar 2015 17:52:25 +0100")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: "Taylan Ulrich
	\"=?UTF-8?Q?Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer?=\"" <taylanbayirli@gmail.com>
Cc: 20039@debbugs.gnu.org

taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer") skribis:

> While looking into another issue, I happened to notice dangling .so
> references in some executables in Guix packages.  This is the first in a
> series of bug reports for each such package.  Some might be false
> positives; Mark suggested I report them all so we have a list to go
> through.  It's also not comprehensive because of course I don't have
> every Guix package installed; the script to go through one's /gnu/store
> to get output such as the following for each package is attached at the
> bottom of this mail.

Nice, thanks the reports (although it=E2=80=99s a bit daunting ;-)).

I think there are two things to do:

  1. Identify the reasons why these things aren=E2=80=99t in the RUNPATH:
     missing -L?  ld-wrapper bug (introduced in last =E2=80=98core-updates=
=E2=80=99?)?

  2. Add a standard phase in gnu-build-system.scm, based on (guix elf),
     that checks whether things in DT_NEEDED can actually be found among
     the directories in DT_RUNPATH, and errors out if not.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.