From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add (minimal) BioPerl. Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2015 19:48:23 +0200 Message-ID: <87sia44tjs.fsf@gnu.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35745) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z1ICw-0003GD-TK for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 13:48:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z1ICo-0005MO-ID for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 13:48:34 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:51061) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z1ICo-0005MK-F1 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 13:48:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Wed, 3 Jun 2015 17:53:14 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > From e8cffdb9e7a2447657b3f700b2f0beb00ad0f98e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Ricardo Wurmus > Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 17:44:20 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add BioPerl. > > * gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm (bioperl-minimal): New variable. [...] > +(define-public bioperl-minimal > + (package > + (name "bioperl-minimal") So is it meant to be used as a Perl library, as a standalone executable, or both? If it can be used standalone, the current name is fine. Otherwise, perhaps =E2=80=9Cperl-bioperl-minimal=E2=80=9D. WDYT? > + (native-search-paths (list (search-path-specification > + (variable "PERL5LIB") > + (files '("lib/perl5/site_perl"))))) Why is it needed? At first sight it looks wrong because PERL5LIB is =E2=80=9Cowned=E2=80=9D by Perl itself. If there=E2=80=99s an executable that needs to find the libs listed in =E2=80=98propagated-inputs=E2=80=99, the best way would be to use =E2=80=98= wrap-program=E2=80=99, I think. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.