From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: wip-refactor-emacs-ui and Hydra interface
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2016 17:27:47 +0300
Message-ID: <87si2ggios.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87vb85gqes.fsf@gmail.com> <871ta5zkxt.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87mvssueqx.fsf@gnu.org> <87lh8a2xen.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87poxli9dr.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38484)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1aFN9s-0005ok-DZ
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2016 09:27:53 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1aFN9p-0000ST-6S
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2016 09:27:52 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87poxli9dr.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\=
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Fri, 01 Jan 2016 16:53:36 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Ludovic Court=C3=A8s (2016-01-01 18:53 +0300) wrote:

> Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s (2015-12-30 18:40 +0300) wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> Could you in a separate commit prepare a NEWS entry for 0.9.1 that
>>> succinctly lists these differences?
>>
>> Sure.  Is the attached patch sufficient?  If it is, I suppose this
>> branch can be merged now, OK?
>
> Sure!

OK, merged, thanks!  Let's see how many bugs I introduced :-)

--=20
Alex