From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Remove an unused patch? Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2016 22:57:03 +0100 Message-ID: <87si041tcg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160305161456.GA25823@solar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53590) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1acKCD-0000qZ-Ai for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2016 16:57:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1acKCA-0000lb-4J for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2016 16:57:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20160305161456.GA25823@solar> (Andreas Enge's message of "Sat, 5 Mar 2016 17:14:56 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Andreas Enge skribis: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 11:22:30PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: >> The patch file 'cpio-gets-undeclared.patch' was "de-applied" to the cpio >> sources when we upgraded cpio to 2.12 (92d0fcb6dc5). But, it was never >> deleted or removed from gnu-system.am. > > I think it can be safely removed. No, because the patch is still used by two other packages, Dico and Rush (confusingly enough; this is because the problem being fixed was in Gnulib, and thus widespread.) Ludo=E2=80=99.