* aseprite is now EULA licensed. @ 2016-09-03 0:55 ng0 2016-09-03 8:57 ` Nicolas Goaziou 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: ng0 @ 2016-09-03 0:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: guix-devel 2 days ago they changed from gpl-2 to eula. This could theoretically mean we can update to 1.1.7 and freeze it there (hoping that a compatible licensed fork appears or whatever will happen)? http://dev.aseprite.org/post/149797781837/new-source-code-license https://github.com/aseprite/aseprite/commit/5ecc356a41c8e29977f8608d8826489d24f5fa6c -- ng0 For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: aseprite is now EULA licensed. 2016-09-03 0:55 aseprite is now EULA licensed ng0 @ 2016-09-03 8:57 ` Nicolas Goaziou 2016-09-03 10:43 ` ng0 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Nicolas Goaziou @ 2016-09-03 8:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: guix-devel Hello, ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes: > 2 days ago they changed from gpl-2 to eula. This could theoretically > mean we can update to 1.1.7 and freeze it there (hoping that a > compatible licensed fork appears or whatever will happen)? > > http://dev.aseprite.org/post/149797781837/new-source-code-license > https://github.com/aseprite/aseprite/commit/5ecc356a41c8e29977f8608d8826489d24f5fa6c I think the license change is a wrong way to solve the developer problem. Anyway, this raises an interesting question: would it make sense for Guix to allow an optional `donate' keyword associated to a list of URLs package definitions? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou 0x80A93738 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: aseprite is now EULA licensed. 2016-09-03 8:57 ` Nicolas Goaziou @ 2016-09-03 10:43 ` ng0 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: ng0 @ 2016-09-03 10:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nicolas Goaziou, guix-devel Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes: > Hello, > > ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes: > >> 2 days ago they changed from gpl-2 to eula. This could theoretically >> mean we can update to 1.1.7 and freeze it there (hoping that a >> compatible licensed fork appears or whatever will happen)? >> >> http://dev.aseprite.org/post/149797781837/new-source-code-license >> https://github.com/aseprite/aseprite/commit/5ecc356a41c8e29977f8608d8826489d24f5fa6c > > I think the license change is a wrong way to solve the developer > problem. > > Anyway, this raises an interesting question: would it make sense for > Guix to allow an optional `donate' keyword associated to a list of URLs > package definitions? > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas Goaziou 0x80A93738 > Interesting idea.. it would allow metadata for the package listing webview in the future and if someone wants to donate they don't have to search the project websites, but could get a direct link to their web site which lists details if available. I don't know if we can do that, but I'd be in favor for it as there is no damage attached for all involved parties. -- ng0 For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-09-03 10:43 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2016-09-03 0:55 aseprite is now EULA licensed ng0 2016-09-03 8:57 ` Nicolas Goaziou 2016-09-03 10:43 ` ng0
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.