From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: Re: aseprite is now EULA licensed. Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2016 10:43:00 +0000 Message-ID: <87shth6z7v.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> References: <87twdx244p.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <878tv9z7gi.fsf@saiph.selenimh> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56135) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bg8Pl-0004s7-7M for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2016 06:43:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bg8Pg-0003Ye-57 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2016 06:43:08 -0400 Received: from mithlond.libertad.in-berlin.de ([2001:67c:1400:2490::1]:49248 helo=beleriand.n0.is) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bg8Pf-0003YZ-OE for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2016 06:43:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: <878tv9z7gi.fsf@saiph.selenimh> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Nicolas Goaziou , guix-devel@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > ng0 writes: > >> 2 days ago they changed from gpl-2 to eula. This could theoretically >> mean we can update to 1.1.7 and freeze it there (hoping that a >> compatible licensed fork appears or whatever will happen)? >> >> http://dev.aseprite.org/post/149797781837/new-source-code-license >> https://github.com/aseprite/aseprite/commit/5ecc356a41c8e29977f8608d8826489d24f5fa6c > > I think the license change is a wrong way to solve the developer > problem. > > Anyway, this raises an interesting question: would it make sense for > Guix to allow an optional `donate' keyword associated to a list of URLs > package definitions? > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas Goaziou 0x80A93738 > Interesting idea.. it would allow metadata for the package listing webview in the future and if someone wants to donate they don't have to search the project websites, but could get a direct link to their web site which lists details if available. I don't know if we can do that, but I'd be in favor for it as there is no damage attached for all involved parties. -- ng0 For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org