Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0

[ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)]

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:

> On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 10:35:09PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Seems like most of the arguments and phases are shared with ‘openssl’,
>> right?  What about using ‘substitute-keyword-arguments’ to reduce
>> duplication?  Or are you concerned about potential breakage when one
>> series or the other changes?
>
> I've attached an updated patch using 'substitute-keyword-arguments'.
>
> BTW, my previous patch made a one-line change to 'move-man3-pages',
> deleting the leftover empty man3 directory in the main output after
> copying the manpages to the 'doc' output. Is this change desired?

Sure.  Perhaps you can commit this part to core-updates?

> From 83405a4ea3628cababd2ee5904c8d0628a002d05 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
> Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 16:07:29 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add openssl-next.
>
> * gnu/packages/tls.scm (openssl-next): New variable.
> * gnu/packages/patches/openssl-1.1.0-c-rehash-in.patch: New file.
> * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it.

LGTM, thank you!

Ludo’.