From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: iyzsong@member.fsf.org (=?utf-8?B?5a6L5paH5q2m?=) Subject: Re: Preparing mass-packaging of 170 KDE application - hwo to do? Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 10:51:27 +0800 Message-ID: <87shqdeits.fsf@member.fsf.org> References: <58382A5D.40403@crazy-compilers.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49549) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cApZQ-0004oh-33 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 21:52:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cApZN-0007SX-0j for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 21:52:00 -0500 Received: from smtp21.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.55]:46770 helo=smtp6.openmailbox.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cApZM-0007SH-QX for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 21:51:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <58382A5D.40403@crazy-compilers.com> (Hartmut Goebel's message of "Fri, 25 Nov 2016 13:11:09 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Hartmut Goebel Cc: guix-devel Hartmut Goebel writes: > Hi, > > I'm currently working on a script to mass-generate *draft* packages for > KDE applications. Ca. 170 of them :-) These are the ones listed at > > > The idea is to have a draft which can easily be taken and adopted. > Inputs will be lists at best knowledge (taken from the CMakeLists.txt > file). Synopsis and description are pre-filled from Debian and Mageia. Amazing works! > > Nevertheless 170 packages are a lot of work, which I would like to > distribute. Esp. checking the licenses and linting is quite some effort. > > Questions: > > * To distribute the workload, I'd like to put the drafts somewhere. > Should I push this into a wip-branch? Or hat else would be an option? Yes, please. And instead of working on this branch directly and merge it as a whole, I think we can cherry-pick 1 by 1 from it. > > * Should these apps be sorted alphabetically of being grouped > (development, office, system, education, utilis, =E2=80=A6)? No prefernece here. Thanks for the works!