From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35733)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ctBf1-0004DU-Bz
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 07:21:08 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ctBew-0005YZ-DT
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 07:21:07 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51990)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1ctBew-0005YI-9n
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 07:21:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ctBew-000405-3Z
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 07:21:02 -0400
Subject: bug#26248: Should we recompile Vala code in LXDE?
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.26248.B26248.149078643415328@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
References: <20170325002448.ghzfxtyix4vzhukz@abyayala>
	<874lydtanf.fsf@gnu.org> <20170329081646.h6xahvisnvvj7uqz@abyayala>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:20:19 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20170329081646.h6xahvisnvvj7uqz@abyayala> (ng0's message of
	"Wed, 29 Mar 2017 08:16:46 +0000")
Message-ID: <87shlws51o.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: 26248@debbugs.gnu.org

ng0 <contact.ng0@cryptolab.net> skribis:

> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s transcribed 0.3K bytes:
>> Oh, another comment: some of the packages, such as lxsession, contain C
>> code generated from Vala (the tarball contains both the Vala source and
>> the generated C code.)
>>=20
>> I don=E2=80=99t think there=E2=80=99s a precedent (?), but we may want t=
o remove the
>> generated code and rebuild it from source.
>>=20
>> Thoughts?
>>=20
>> Ludo=E2=80=99.
>>=20
>
> Yes, we should definitely do that.

Done in a4cdcffb19f38b47bb7e0234c1244edbede35d59.

It seems lxsession is the only one that uses Vala.

Ludo=E2=80=99.