From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Getting rid of alpha label Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 16:57:55 +0200 Message-ID: <87shlcnymk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20170412062401.GA8251@mail.thebird.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43099) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cygC9-0004eO-TT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 10:58:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cygC5-00017b-Ve for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 10:58:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170412062401.GA8251@mail.thebird.nl> (Pjotr Prins's message of "Wed, 12 Apr 2017 06:24:01 +0000") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Pjotr Prins Cc: guix-devel Heya! Pjotr Prins skribis: > Can we get rid of the alpha status? It suggests packages are in alpha, > which they are not.=20 > > I have already had two different administrators in two environments > claiming that Guix packages can not be deployed on HPC systems because > it is alpha.=20 > > The excuse is too easy ;) I agree. ;-) After FOSDEM Ricardo removed the big blue banner that was saying Guix is alpha/beta. So now the only mentions of =E2=80=9Cbeta=E2=80=9D that are le= ft are: 1. on the =E2=80=9CTEST=E2=80=9D button on the home page; 2. under GuixSD at . I think we can remove #1. Is this what you had in mind? Cheers, Ludo=E2=80=99.