From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48413) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dSs9V-0005En-Px for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 17:48:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dSs9T-0002Oo-67 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 17:48:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51159) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dSs9T-0002Oh-2T for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 17:48:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dSs9S-0006mD-S3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 17:48:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#27549] [PATCH] gnu: vpnc: Update to 0.5.3, revision-550. Resent-Message-ID: References: <87y3s8kybp.fsf@gmail.com> <01350273-2593-618d-a461-b99c1f310265@tobias.gr> <3702cc9a-9066-4e6c-c9be-050e5e6c1ffe@tobias.gr> From: Jelle Licht In-reply-to: <3702cc9a-9066-4e6c-c9be-050e5e6c1ffe@tobias.gr> Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 23:08:38 +0200 Message-ID: <87shiaiobt.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Cc: 27549@debbugs.gnu.org Tobias, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes: > Jelle, > > On 01/07/17 19:18, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: >> I'd started on packaging those updated vpnc-scripts, [...] >> I'll dig them up and see how far I got. > > Found 'em! If you have some spare time, could you give the attached > patches a try? They look finished[0], but I don't have a VPN to test. > > I hope we can avoid relying on the copy of vpnc-scripts bundled with vpnc: > > - the bundled copy still lags behind upstream[1], even in trunk > - unbundling allows using a stable release of the vpnc client instead > of a subversion checkout, while still easily updating the scripts > - and shaves ~50MiB from our openconnect package. Fair enough, this seems like a good reason to apply your patches ;-). > > Of course, it has to actually work for you first :-) Good news! Your patches work, I verified this with my university vpn. Why are we using this specific versions of the vpnc-scripts? What is the problem regarding `wrap-keys' (wrap-program?) exactly? Regards, Jelle