From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50881) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dXE1m-0002un-5N for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 17:58:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dXE1j-0007kc-4h for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 17:58:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42350) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dXE1i-0007kQ-OI for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 17:58:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dXE1i-0000GC-HJ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 17:58:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#27685] [PATCH] gnu: Add libusb-0.1 Resent-Message-ID: From: Marius Bakke In-Reply-To: <9df88aa3-525d-8ff1-d6a6-91aecc764630@web.de> References: <1499987475-26967-1-git-send-email-jonathan.brielmaier@web.de> <878tjo6pvc.fsf@fastmail.com> <9df88aa3-525d-8ff1-d6a6-91aecc764630@web.de> Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 23:57:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87shhu6824.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Jonathan Brielmaier , 27685@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Jonathan Brielmaier writes: > Okay, I'll update the patch tomorrow. > > 0xffff[1] (which I already packaged local) depends on libusb-0.1. > Although it compiles fine with libusb-compat, during executing it throws > an error[2]. > > I hope this is a good reason :) > > [1] https://github.com/pali/0xFFFF > [2] > https://github.com/pali/0xFFFF/blob/08485a0c094cf021e5abedd001741da9d0fd1474/src/usb-device.c#L325 Oh, okay. I didn't know we had libusb-compat either. Thanks for clarifying! The last patch LGTM, but I'm still hesitant to add it without an actual in-tree user. Will you submit the 0xFFFF package? It would be good to have it as an explaining comment near the libusb-0.1 package definition, so future packagers don't have to ask the same questions. Unmaintained and (seemingly) obsolete software is also prone to sudden removal :-) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlltMrMACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPpz7ggAytA2vJpLCfWNVlVeZimVBy6WwmDSV4pKMWrJZeVvhAtYqvvikzcs/0Ui mQvUhB6cjfVf51nIG9ClvHOYQmrALA7ZmGX7gvArOx5F2rR9dOUUIRQZbbtq1wIZ WoDfHTuX7RWcpMQ8DxyVYdapMvtwjOsDAPAXEp6jU1NS2helpfoe6u/jaQuTVUhQ 28GKrCPSjeDO1nDDivWIdb0djbGos2lm445j+n58ya8m8NKeiTIv4RvkIHsilXDT H3sPxS+vfPjYmzUFfXblJrColL/ezeZfbwCX4WT7umtI7eNL8Fvcu1mCkmpyI767 lKGbkFDD+9cT18HKgWdoRbK1MsXEyg== =/rIy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--