From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Adopt a patch!
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 16:22:57 +0200
Message-ID: <87shferewu.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87h8vw2lfz.fsf@elephly.net> <87d16k86aj.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87mv5npzdq.fsf@elephly.net>
	<20170922.124224.309712304599155906.post@thomasdanckaert.be>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34250)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1dvOrD-0001Ja-0K
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 10:23:07 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1dvOrC-0007Es-7i
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 10:23:07 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20170922.124224.309712304599155906.post@thomasdanckaert.be>
	(Thomas Danckaert's message of "Fri, 22 Sep 2017 12:42:24 +0200
	(CEST)")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Thomas Danckaert <post@thomasdanckaert.be>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com

Hi Thomas,

I understand and sympathize with your arguments.  In fact, this has been
a long running theme, and we discussed it at last year=E2=80=99s FOSDEM at
length.  :-)

Thomas Danckaert <post@thomasdanckaert.be> skribis:

> So I do see the appeal of something like gitlab, but I also wonder how
> it could be integrated in the current workflow.  I think it could help
> a lot if debbugs took some ideas from github/gitlab, but I don't think
> debbugs is actively worked on?

At FOSDEM, while we have having a drink late at night, someone said
=E2=80=9CLet=E2=80=99s just write a nice Web interface to Debbugs in Guile!=
=E2=80=9D, and we
were all like =E2=80=9CYeah, let=E2=80=99s do that!=E2=80=9D.  But of cours=
e on the next
morning, we were all thinking about something else already.  ;-)

So, I don=E2=80=99t know!  I=E2=80=99m still open to experimenting with a l=
ocal
GitLab/Kallithea/whatever instance.  If someone writes packages and a
GuixSD service, that could be easy.  Hint, hint!  :-)

Ludo=E2=80=99.