From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39513) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ebV6i-0007UN-Ro for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 12:33:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ebV6c-0006uB-Tx for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 12:33:08 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51109) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ebV6c-0006u7-Qa for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 12:33:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ebV6c-0000yH-BW for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 12:33:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#28832] [PATCH 1/3] gnu: Add emacs-json-reformat. Resent-Message-ID: From: Alex Kost References: <87lgke3vlz.fsf@gmail.com> <20171014102915.11778-1-go.wigust@gmail.com> <87y3o6uheo.fsf@gnu.org> <87d13yiw6w.fsf@gnu.org> <87609cluzf.fsf@gmail.com> <87zi6os3u3.fsf@gnu.org> <87po6gm5l6.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvvntjpe.fsf@gmail.com> <877esjgsbh.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 20:32:25 +0300 In-Reply-To: <877esjgsbh.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Mon, 15 Jan 2018 14:33:22 +0100") Message-ID: <87shb5ogk6.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 28832@debbugs.gnu.org Ludovic Court=C3=A8s (2018-01-15 14:33 +0100) wrote: > Oleg Pykhalov skribis: [...] >> I thought we suspend this until automation of "-L" flags. > > No no, the =E2=80=9COK with these changes=E2=80=9D above really means you= can go ahead. > :-) > > The =E2=80=9C-L=E2=80=9D discussion is about an improvement we should mak= e, but it > should not block this patch. > >> Seems like a similar discussion[1] gets stuck too. >> Pushed as b0912e9fdbffab15d9a754b2922778cfbd1fac2a > > Yeah, though I don=E2=80=99t think you should wait for Alex or anyone els= e to > make a decision: if you have an idea on how to improve this, based on > these discussions, then you=E2=80=99re probably in a good position to do = it and > everyone will be happy. ;-) I didn't think someone waits for me. My last message was: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D28832#71 and I wasn't going to write anything else until a reply. To make it clear: I don't mind any decision you make, I participated in this discussion just because I was CC-ed. Please, go on with whatever seems appropriate to you. --=20 Alex