From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kei Kebreau Subject: Re: RFC: Portability should be a higher priority for Guix (was Re: 01/01: build-system/meson: Really skip the 'fix-runpath' phase on armhf.) Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2018 10:15:34 -0400 Message-ID: <87sh4xzs3d.fsf@posteo.net> References: <20180702101757.22792.51026@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20180702101758.97A6020543@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <8736x1r1g0.fsf@netris.org> <877emdwm0f.fsf@fastmail.com> <87efgknn2v.fsf@netris.org> <87in5veaao.fsf@gnu.org> <871scin5bs.fsf_-_@netris.org> <87k1qamy30.fsf@posteo.net> <87h8legjoy.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58443) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fb532-0000WS-N6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2018 10:15:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fb52x-0000Sm-P5 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2018 10:15:52 -0400 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:58581) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fb52x-0000Ia-FP for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2018 10:15:47 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF45420ED1 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2018 16:15:44 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87h8legjoy.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Thu, 05 Jul 2018 10:39:41 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Hello Kei, > > Kei Kebreau skribis: > >> I am interested in helping with non-x86_64 issues. Particularly, helping >> with i686-related changes should be just a change in workflow, but I'm >> interested in obtaining freedom-respecting non-x86 hardware (or at least >> using a virtual machine as close as possible to real hardware >> configurations). Any recommendation or links for where I can get a >> Yeeloong laptop or what freedom-respecting armhf computers are >> available? > > Without having actual hardware, you can use the qemu-binfmt service on > your machine (info "(guix) Virtualization Services"). It=E2=80=99s slow,= but it > allows you to reproduce and debug issues for other architectures. > > Thanks, > Ludo=E2=80=99. Wow, this is excellent! Thanks for the tip. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEg7ZwOtzKO2lLzi2m5qXuPBlGeg0FAls+KAYACgkQ5qXuPBlG eg3DvRAAhNI9FmkR/PxAYXsIYg6M9WVd+JYdWM/RQJ09/uMuoRZ/fESINwfttXmJ VarFfqv4Jw3IgnXZMtiYopdV+zfk/2jGWGly11YQM0Rb4n0qhW5fX6rieAs0bC7f lA9qC3XJl/Z+n27TvAEhvIhwP6YypvkrxJ2kHpPpp/Oj27DBrH9i69h3qS4hDzaE 1DgHZEY84+LcPSgX2/6rca4WWwr/bShxBH7/bVFznKV9Br1katsC1utlzRqwHs4o kwoROlaGbyTZht0tyxeD6tR8O//2Etkr51KYtu3D3Rl4T3it8+h5l4LDoDMYBxW8 gqKyuh1q/0gm3XeEefzFtS//hAu/MoFx10IUKot6JYFPitzYNcOkt067jO0nEaMd c+2EqdGqhoSGmkxAgnAuUlmZ/fPKdCTAgRrCXuq/5wb4zm74ONgx2Rj6sqwZtUYu ReUx+Zt3ZvNoBaHg2h/Qs6kkpgihwJZj5UTEg2kyAnqfdqQmyoSUurroNM0pxeAJ yPXbTI9QQ4guAjJSyMtQUmUsLH6UK8zoxeUNuvh9z8AkWS32up5Ge6e/jVP1ZsbY QLG7gULc6OcFX5BvzgS8m0nuy06jte7ZYSoTMKLNh2BYnom3S7GyomPvU2RbZbsx V4UNlQcyq1bE0ezRKOaxExeth7+x2NPqag3ELk6u0cEmQgRBgCM= =tcCd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--