From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: bug#31319: ghc-case-insensitive: Duplicate 'inputs' field. Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 17:23:17 -0400 Message-ID: <87sh4d38l6.fsf@netris.org> References: <87a7tka8ko.fsf@netris.org> <878t8swj9n.fsf@gnu.org> <87lgcrcrxk.fsf@netris.org> <871scliy9p.fsf@gnu.org> <878t67wnjr.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40272) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgcte-0000U0-TA for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 17:25:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgcta-00012C-UB for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 17:25:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45011) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgcta-00011W-PR for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 17:25:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fgcta-0008CR-I4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 17:25:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <878t67wnjr.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Thu, 19 Jul 2018 12:02:48 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 31319@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Ludovic, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Ping! > > I=E2=80=99d really like to apply the patch you posted in > > along with the corresponding package fixes. Yes, sorry for the long delay on this. I've been nervous about , which I encountered after applying my patch to detect duplicate fields, and which has not yet been explained as far as I know. The problem seems to be sensitive to seemingly unrelated changes in the source tree. Since I run Guix from my own private branch, I'm not confident what will happen if I apply this patch to master. > I can do that if you want. Please do. Thanks! Mark