From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43039)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gCNX4-0007dn-Sh
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 07:29:03 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gCNX4-0006MQ-1l
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 07:29:02 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47633)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1gCNX3-0006L4-Rx
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 07:29:01 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gCNX3-0008Dp-Mt
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 07:29:01 -0400
Subject: [bug#33010] [PATCH 2/3] gnu: Add guix-minimal.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.33010.B33010.153968929231535@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
References: <20181011015246.24964-1-ericbavier@centurylink.net>
	<20181011015246.24964-3-ericbavier@centurylink.net>
	<87a7ngdx25.fsf@gnu.org> <20181015092143.0ce224d4@centurylink.net>
	<87tvlnc8m8.fsf@gnu.org> <20181015194308.GP117864@pe06.us.cray.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 13:28:01 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20181015194308.GP117864@pe06.us.cray.com> (Eric Bavier's message
	of "Mon, 15 Oct 2018 14:43:08 -0500")
Message-ID: <87sh16i11a.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Eric Bavier <bavier@cray.com>
Cc: 33010@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi Eric,

Eric Bavier <bavier@cray.com> skribis:

> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 09:28:31PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
>> Eric Bavier <ericbavier@centurylink.net> skribis:
>>=20
>> > On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 23:42:58 +0200
>> > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote:
>> >> I wonder whether we should add packages =E2=80=9Cjust=E2=80=9D for th=
is, especially
>> >> given that 2.0 support is reaching end-of-life and that 2.0.13 is pre=
tty
>> >> old.
>> >
>> > This package would be updated as needed to reflect changes in Guix
>> > dependencies.
>>=20
>> OK.  It does sound like an interesting CI job, but maybe not great as a
>> package users can install.  Though of course we can mark it as hidden
>> and then it=E2=80=99s just an easy way to write that CI job.  Thoughts?
>
> I think marking it "hidden" would be fine.

OK, let=E2=80=99s do that, along with a comment explaining the purpose of t=
his
package.

> Do the build farms automatically build hidden packages too?

Yes I think so (see =E2=80=98all-packages=E2=80=99 in build-aux/hydra/gnu-s=
ystem.scm.)

Thanks!

Ludo=E2=80=99.