From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: bug#33419: guix package is not showing that the checksum is
	mismatching
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 21:30:46 +0100
Message-ID: <87sgzwx11l.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20181118150433.63437ece@alma-ubu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45779)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gOqCE-0007d0-MG
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 15:31:03 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gOqCD-00008a-UK
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 15:31:02 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57016)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1gOqCD-00008S-R9
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 15:31:01 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gOqCD-0005Vb-N9
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 15:31:01 -0500
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.33419.B33419.154265945721160@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <20181118150433.63437ece@alma-ubu> ("=?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?=
	=?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?="'s message of
	"Sun, 18 Nov 2018 15:04:33 +0100")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?= <bjoern.hoefling@bjoernhoefling.de>
Cc: 33419@debbugs.gnu.org

Hello,

Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling <bjoern.hoefling@bjoernhoefling.de> skribis:

> $ guix package -u guix-tools
> substitute: updating list of substitutes from 'https://berlin.guixsd.org'=
...   0
> [..]
> building /gnu/store/vy3s1y7bv1w6d8gmp5b10xppy9skbgkd-guix-tools-0.1.0-2.4=
f17b79-checkout.drv...
> build of /gnu/store/vy3s1y7bv1w6d8gmp5b10xppy9skbgkd-guix-tools-0.1.0-2.4=
f17b79-checkout.drv failed
> View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/vy/3s1y7bv1w6d8gmp5b10xppy9skbgkd-g=
uix-tools-0.1.0-2.4f17b79-checkout.drv.bz2'.
> -guix package: error: build failed: build of `/gnu/store/iwma3gq778n32mqz=
6y7277g67nvx1abb-guix-tools-0.1.0-2.4f17b79.drv' failed

[...]

> $ guix build guix-tools
>
> HEAD is now at 4f17b79 gdev: Add more package to environment.
> environment variable `PATH' unset
> output path `/gnu/store/s399g9f1k19v01rs992w5dl6aif87har-guix-tools-0.1.0=
-2.4f17b79-checkout' should have r:sha256 hash `1j4q43hk7jrys7zsmws37g6w7ba=
bzshfdb1s5myl7qwr3mcx6hnf', instead has `0b61q29915b4i6adidx3zixnx3m0zp58rj=
bfa9byqcz13szznc52'
> build of /gnu/store/vy3s1y7bv1w6d8gmp5b10xppy9skbgkd-guix-tools-0.1.0-2.4=
f17b79-checkout.drv failed
> View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/vy/3s1y7bv1w6d8gmp5b10xppy9skbgkd-g=
uix-tools-0.1.0-2.4f17b79-checkout.drv.bz2'.
> cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/iwma3gq778n32mqz6y7277g67nvx1abb-guix=
-tools-0.1.0-2.4f17b79.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
> guix build: error: build failed: build of `/gnu/store/iwma3gq778n32mqz6y7=
277g67nvx1abb-guix-tools-0.1.0-2.4f17b79.drv' failed
>
>
> Is it intended that this build-failure detail is not shown? I suppose
> not. At least in a log it should be shown.

I suspect you=E2=80=99re running an =E2=80=9Cold=E2=80=9D guix-daemon, aren=
=E2=80=99t you?

Could you try again with an up-to-date daemon (and client)?  The code
that prints hash mismatch errors when talking to recent daemons is in
(guix status).

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.