From: Diego Nicola Barbato <dnbarbato@posteo.de>
To: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: 33647@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#33647: First `guix pull' behaves unexpectedly
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2018 09:36:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sgz9spgw.fsf@GlaDOS.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871s6ugsrq.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Fri, 07 Dec 2018 00:06:01 +0100")
Hello,
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
> Hello,
>
> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> skribis:
>
>>> Hello Guix,
>>>
>>> The first time a user runs ‘guix pull’ after a fresh install it does not
>>> seem to update guix. ‘guix --version’ reports that guix is still
>>> version 0.15.0 after running ‘guix pull’, instead of showing the hash of
>>> the latest commit.
>>
>> “guix pull” should have reminded you to add ~/.config/guix/current/bin
>> to the front of your PATH environment variable. When you do that you
>> will be using the new version of Guix.
I forgot to mention that this is on GuixSD, where
~/.config/guix/currend/bin is already in PATH, which maybe explains why
I did not get a reminder.
> In addition, be aware that Bash maintains a cache of commands it looked
> up in $PATH. Thus it may be that, say, it had cached that ‘guix’ is
> really /run/current-system/profile/bin/guix. When you pulled, it didn’t
> invalidate its cache thus you kept using that old version.
>
> The solution is to run “hash guix” at the Bash prompt to force cache
> invalidation (info "(bash) Bourne Shell Builtins").
I believe this is it. This also explains why ‘which guix’ returned the
updated guix while ‘guix --version’ claimed it was still the older
version, which I found rather confusing.
I am afraid being unaware of this has led me to inadvertently downgrade
GuixSD whenever I reconfigured for the first time after a fresh install.
Thanks!
Diego
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-07 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-06 14:56 bug#33647: First `guix pull' behaves unexpectedly Diego Nicola Barbato
2018-12-06 15:42 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2018-12-06 17:03 ` Diego Nicola Barbato
2018-12-06 23:06 ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-12-07 8:36 ` Diego Nicola Barbato [this message]
2018-12-07 9:41 ` Björn Höfling
2018-12-07 13:30 ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-12-19 12:49 ` Diego Nicola Barbato
2018-12-19 17:37 ` swedebugia
2018-12-19 19:27 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
2018-12-20 5:24 ` swedebugia
2019-01-18 16:54 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-01-22 22:07 ` Diego Nicola Barbato
2019-01-23 9:51 ` Ludovic Courtès
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sgz9spgw.fsf@GlaDOS.home \
--to=dnbarbato@posteo.de \
--cc=33647@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=ludo@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.