From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Lemmer Webber Subject: bug#33772: StumpWM broken commands? Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 09:49:25 -0500 Message-ID: <87sgyty3ka.fsf@dustycloud.org> References: <878t0pqol1.fsf@dustycloud.org> <8736qvhym3.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1k67uz1.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87o99iwmuo.fsf@gmail.com> <87d0px7hv8.fsf@dustycloud.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41285) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gZdAm-0002f5-Q8 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 09:50:14 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gZdAg-0002tj-IH for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 09:50:08 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49862) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gZdAg-0002td-Du for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 09:50:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gZdAg-0000Ch-A4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 09:50:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: <87d0px7hv8.fsf@dustycloud.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Pierre Langlois Cc: 33772@debbugs.gnu.org, Alex Kost Christopher Lemmer Webber writes: > Pierre Langlois writes: > >> Alex Kost writes: >> >>> I have built stumpwm from the latest commit (which is one commit after >>> 18.11 release) and tried it on GuixSD and on ArchLinux. Works for me >>> on both systems, so it's probably not an upstream bug. >> >> Hi Alex, >> >> I was investigating just now and thought I'd try that one commit that >> was pushed after the release. The description doesn't sound like it >> would fix the problem but it was easy to try that. But it looks like it >> does fix the problem! >> >> Can you confirm the attached patch works for you? >> > I haven't tried it yet but it makes a lot of sense that this would fix > it. Both gnew and eval interactively pull up a request for a line of > input. I applied your patch to my machine and it fixed it... thank you! I pushed the patch upstream to guix master.