From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56619) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h48zv-0000qL-Py for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 14:53:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h48zv-0006SK-2n for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 14:53:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57195) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h48zu-0006SC-On for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 14:53:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h48zu-0008LI-Go for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 14:53:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#34044] Packaging Jami (ex GNU Ring) Resent-Message-ID: References: <87h8efvx6e.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <871s3a6cq6.fsf@elephly.net> <87a7hyty0x.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> From: Ricardo Wurmus In-reply-to: <87a7hyty0x.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 19:51:42 +0100 Message-ID: <87sgvq4ngh.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Pierre Neidhardt Cc: 34044@debbugs.gnu.org Pierre Neidhardt writes: > Looking more closely, the closure of qtbase contains both sqlite packages= has > well. > I suspect a bug in the qtbase package. That might be because dependencies of qtbase don=E2=80=99t use that same sq= lite variant. Generally, we should make sure that we don=E2=80=99t have differe= nt library variants in the closure. What pulls in the vanilla sqlite package? Can we use input rewriting to ensure that all references to sqlite are replaced with sqlite-with-column-metadata? (This would require building package variants.) -- Ricardo