From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jelle Licht <jlicht@fsfe.org>
Subject: Re: branch master updated (0aa0e1f -> 9b7f9e6)
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:45:32 +0100
Message-ID: <87sgiz1rdv.fsf@jlicht.xyz>
References: <20200224101817.20439.52918@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
 <87blpom285.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CAJ3okZ1Rns2ZmbqY3xXr8QAn6bMeCcQA-qBnDz7ohCNMbGyNhQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <87v9nvg1wf.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48517)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <jlicht@fsfe.org>) id 1j6NPy-0005Q8-63
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 18:45:43 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <jlicht@fsfe.org>) id 1j6NPw-0002TD-9F
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 18:45:42 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87v9nvg1wf.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel"
 <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
Cc: Guix Devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

Heya,

Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> [...]
> I see reluctance to the proposed changes in
> <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2020-02/msg00031.html> (I
> agree with Ricardo=E2=80=99s concerns).
>
> To me, that suggests at least that further discussion would have been
> needed before pushing these three commits.
>
> What should we do now?

Please do not re-break guix search in eshell by reverting 9b7f9e6f9;
I've enjoyed the roughly 2 hours of using it for the first time in what
seems like forever.

There is no reasonable workaround for this issue that I know of that has
been proposed, so let us not make the good the enemy of the perfect.

Thanks,
- Jelle