From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id kLT1EPWmimC3lwAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 14:30:45 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id 2LHNDPWmimBjFgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 12:30:45 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C5AF1F33C for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 14:30:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:47362 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lc5oZ-0001NA-IV for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 08:30:43 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43500) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lc5dK-0000i1-Aa for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 08:19:08 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43462) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lc5dF-0006ys-TA for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 08:19:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lc5dF-0004yY-PC for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 08:19:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#48033] [PATCH] gnu: public-inbox: Update to 1.6.1. Resent-From: Xinglu Chen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 12:19:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48033 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Kyle Meyer Cc: 48033@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 48033-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48033.161969869319071 (code B ref 48033); Thu, 29 Apr 2021 12:19:01 +0000 Received: (at 48033) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2021 12:18:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55008 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lc5cS-0004xX-Pp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 08:18:12 -0400 Received: from h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se ([87.96.130.155]:41496 helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lc5cR-0004xJ-4P for 48033@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 08:18:12 -0400 From: Xinglu Chen DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz; s=mail; t=1619698685; bh=oNIXmWNxXn2cBhMaFXAB6j/EnblIrTF4jXzQoZj2uN8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=FzZSnVv1qVJi1H+tJry9gxV7cm+3VfHvRyGb+2h/FJ/UvZgYi/4JiZ9VKMi0uaPGJ Fyw0UsX4c/k/GGW09SLZwAwgF5xyBu57gshZOO1W1LPfTjbfXYV30f6IsqxP4TxQmD 11xZetsggW0Zy1kK++ARUTXBZ5HiqFMS+JhMnJM4= In-Reply-To: <87r1iut6rz.fsf@kyleam.com> References: <8d66684c511e3a36830465481851f9d86d4d6231.1619439907.git.public@yoctocell.xyz> <87wnso8re5.fsf@kyleam.com> <87zgxjv5q5.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> <87v987v3sg.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> <87a6pjujgc.fsf@kyleam.com> <871rautuqw.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> <87r1iut6rz.fsf@kyleam.com> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 14:18:05 +0200 Message-ID: <87sg39uvwi.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.00 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; none X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 0C5AF1F33C X-Spam-Score: -4.00 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: ELfkBxLNyd5Q On Wed, Apr 28 2021, Kyle Meyer wrote: >> Also, >> lib/PublicInbox/WwwHighlight.pm has this comment: >> >> # TODO: support highlight(1) for distros which don't package the >> # SWIG extension. Also, there may be admins who don't want to >> # have ugly SWIG-generated code in a long-lived Perl process. >> >> Maybe this will become true in the future. :) > > Yeah :) Or even pygments support: > https://public-inbox.org/meta/20191008215321.GA23962@dcvr/ That would be even better :) I will send an updated series for this.