From: Robby Zambito <contact@robbyzambito.me>
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com>
Cc: 62174@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#62174: Cannot use modules with an inferior kernel.
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:48:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sfe73pyq.fsf@robbyzambito.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ef393f71882d0a52e4a58a6ef8e48c534afbea1d.camel@gmail.com>
Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com> writes:
> I think you should try to pin the kernel modules as well. If that
> still doesn't work as intended (it very well might), we have a proper
> case of something that should work but doesn't.
>
> Cheers
Thanks for the suggestion. I tested with the following:
```
(define-values (rz/linux rz/linux-kernel-modules)
(let* ((channels
(list (channel
(name 'guix)
(url "https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git")
(commit "d37b467631d5b0e965ea933b8bda8448993580e9"))))
(inferior (inferior-for-channels channels))
(kernel-version "6.1.15"))
(values (first (lookup-inferior-packages inferior "linux-libre" kernel-version))
(list (first (lookup-inferior-packages inferior "v4l2loopback-linux-module"))))))
(operating-system
...
(kernel rz/linux)
(kernel-loadable-modules rz/linux-kernel-modules)
...)
```
But I receive a different error now:
```
running profile hook of type 'linux-module-database'...
Backtrace:
1 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/7ha0kn8fz8yfi26m3m8997wlc8m?")
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
2007:7 0 (error _ . _)
ice-9/boot-9.scm:2007:7: In procedure error:
Specified Linux kernel and Linux kernel modules are not all of the same version
```
However, if I use the most recent kernel version available in the
inferior...
```
(define-values (rz/linux rz/linux-kernel-modules)
(let* ((channels
(list (channel
(name 'guix)
(url "https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git")
(commit "d37b467631d5b0e965ea933b8bda8448993580e9"))))
(inferior (inferior-for-channels channels))
(kernel-version "6.2.2"))
(values (first (lookup-inferior-packages inferior "linux-libre"))
(list (first (lookup-inferior-packages inferior "v4l2loopback-linux-module"))))))
```
It actually works! So it seems that the problem is specifically with
using kernel modules with a kernel version other than the latest
linux-libre kernel from an inferior. I also tried using a specific
kernel version without an inferior like so:
```
(operating-system
...
(kernel (specification->package "linux-libre@6.1.15"))
(kernel-loadable-modules (list (specification->package"v4l2loopback-linux-module")))
...)
```
And that works as well.
TL;DR: The issue has been narrowed down to using kernel modules with a
kernel from an inferior besides the latest kernel from that inferior.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-14 22:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-14 3:27 bug#62174: Cannot use modules with an inferior kernel Robby Zambito
2023-03-14 19:53 ` Liliana Marie Prikler
2023-03-14 21:48 ` Robby Zambito [this message]
2023-03-15 11:35 ` Jelle Licht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sfe73pyq.fsf@robbyzambito.me \
--to=contact@robbyzambito.me \
--cc=62174@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=liliana.prikler@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.