all messages for Guix-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: MSavoritias <email@msavoritias.me>
To: guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Maybe a way to get a few more developpers to work on Guix ?
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 11:07:27 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sfaiy50q.fsf@fannys.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <875y7e4pma.fsf@gmail.com>


pinoaffe <pinoaffe@gmail.com> writes:

> Nicolas Graves via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." <guix-devel@gnu.org> writes:
>> ... code generation through LLMs. This could itself help Guix generate
>> (and fix) package definitions.
>
> I really don't think that that'd be a good match for Guix.  Writing
> package definitions is easy, can be assisted with a snippet (such as
> provided in /path/to/guix/etc/snippets/yas/scheme-mode/guix-package) and
> writing a package definition takes hardly more work than verifying that
> an LLM-provided package definition is reasonable.
>
> In other words, I don't think a LLM could make it easier/faster to write
> package definitions.
>
> Kind regards,
> pinoaffe

Yeah Agreed.

It seems to just shift the problem from "We need developers" to "We need
people that verify the output of the LLM." So we are basically stuck
with the same problem.

Regards,
MSavoritias


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-25  8:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-22 13:13 Maybe a way to get a few more developpers to work on Guix ? Nicolas Graves via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
2023-06-22 15:37 ` indieterminacy
2023-06-23  7:02 ` pinoaffe
2023-06-23  8:04   ` Fannys
2023-06-23  8:07   ` MSavoritias [this message]
2023-06-23  8:15   ` Nicolas Graves via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
2023-06-24 11:08 ` Csepp
2023-06-24 12:02   ` Nicolas Graves via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
2023-06-24 16:33     ` Vagrant Cascadian
2023-06-25 16:08       ` Csepp
2023-08-23 13:48       ` Slow guix pull Simon Tournier
2023-06-25 15:53     ` Maybe a way to get a few more developpers to work on Guix ? Csepp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87sfaiy50q.fsf@fannys.me \
    --to=email@msavoritias.me \
    --cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.