From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:478a::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id 4Lj5JqayAWW9oQAAG6o9tA:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 15:01:26 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:478a::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id 4Lj5JqayAWW9oQAAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 15:01:26 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4C7A33509 for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 15:01:25 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none ("invalid DKIM record") header.d=msavoritias.me header.s=20210930 header.b=xPkYu+Id; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=msavoritias.me (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1694610086; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=/QS5g+NE971dKpsPliMalIH7sugDtqyipIqKUrYnWiM=; b=CI53ocrm3ygL1kalfaFvz1lGETdRBbMXOk38Q1KoeJTqPP9nVCWf3ZNxnYdQWYA4pr7D3U K2WRljAIGaVHl4c8JCkZAEd81pGSwHCGuSCi1AqNQfXDDpJggHQ1qrm73T2OyfWcHgpoG9 rvYZh1IKDA7g4iwfEz45KfHHSgbfz4FqHSvfTQPAyigvmyC4sa5OIxfBHgU5VRNDypiFFs BcL8VKSN9Je+2buKblCqJFuRPjvkg6U2WAm0HDyQ9tjTMUSsdEEOLqgnuOab7F2lFs8G3z t4b3DLqcbBp9OoFlj/cne+hqsDvxR5F94eBkEo/3H3lTGGqLtp7Abz+eRgjVdA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1694610086; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=c9vLOIxGsMiEN8J7UVIfaHxbF4nBjbyT3ImCi17+PW5tVOsFD0Oh0smjNb7gfVVTwslad1 mx/hM5gSVxYaKYCtOYTf5ZufW4DugIiMLYEkx+g1pXk4oBkPux5cHVWq4ak7qoF0hJw6Mx lUQOfogpC2Wj3WPwkkHdif6ZLj5FsplzlHaLf+HjzgF8P++zfn5mKpsPl94ESSf3xsjBD8 h2D7q9CkNeXMF15YPFNsba/6CcXveB3hIgQNH8XUmd/gWniFoyDxz7nd6Gr0gYaDY/+S5f Fs8I9RDCeCdZVspJwmhuYs3hH33mlVyb6yQ+nuAcb69J9ucOx92q9ykeFiQomQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none ("invalid DKIM record") header.d=msavoritias.me header.s=20210930 header.b=xPkYu+Id; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=msavoritias.me (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qgPUA-00074u-KJ; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 09:00:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qgPU5-0006vJ-QC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 09:00:47 -0400 Received: from mail.webarch.email ([81.95.52.48]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qgPU0-0005ty-P9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 09:00:45 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 4D0871A8D5E0; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 14:00:33 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=msavoritias.me; s=20210930; t=1694610036; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=/QS5g+NE971dKpsPliMalIH7sugDtqyipIqKUrYnWiM=; b=xPkYu+Idcabq4bX1xQ4mIg3Z63IJAg5lr8HtPOmpkt6r48P0M9BbPHfkJ6YGFzGzsxnJYe EPnUvdEBVFeB96u7+9FNJDSTdBLZ0EbqboI4vJdSjxlfg5A/s3x0U6XKgFqZKXMDWYACG3 KSe6ZX6XHvd18PL6wJkAB97mN8UFnKOiwhusxzlr1AT4XEDemSmquZohKZ2Mu4Gwp59UuV 3JjBaSwdHe5CCobssTYL+GQDcM2DGMHoAMXQKvErJffUpz45rbD59zScY7m324q1pt2tli BkcEa92GRUhadZUzTIEpCSUUiAaISu0sPb0iEIID9aOEfk1lf6XmdTujuuVWUA== References: <87msyhgccg.fsf@disroot.org> <547c097a-d805-9a55-11d9-b0434327f89d@gmail.com> <87sf83r0jv.fsf@gmail.com> <877cpeqij0.fsf@fannys.me> <86a5u1vyvy.fsf@gmail.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.10.5; emacs 28.2 From: MSavoritias To: Simon Tournier Cc: Katherine Cox-Buday , guix-devel@gnu.org, Arun Isaac Subject: Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors? Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 15:59:23 +0300 In-reply-to: <86a5u1vyvy.fsf@gmail.com> Message-ID: <87sf7irzwv.fsf@fannys.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=81.95.52.48; envelope-from=email@msavoritias.me; helo=mail.webarch.email X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 4.22 X-Spam-Score: 4.22 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: B4C7A33509 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx0.migadu.com X-TUID: OfPUav5zJYbZ Simon Tournier writes: > Hi, > > On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 at 12:53, MSavoritias wrote: > >> Do you know if there are any plans to write a scheme bug/patching >> system? Because looking a bit into it, it doesn't seem like its that >> actively developed so maybe we would be better served by one in scheme. >> Or Sourcehut of course as somebody wrote in another email. >> Since not much would change with sr.ht anyways. > > The only work I know is named tissue by Arun Isaac. Arun also > contributes to Mumi (one web front-end of the venerable Debbugs instance > of the GNU project). > > https://tissue.systemreboot.net/ > https://archive.fosdem.org/2023/schedule/event/tissue/ > > Well, I am not convinced by the argument =C2=AB we would be better served= by > one in scheme =C2=BB. For instance, Cuirass or Build Coordinator or even > Mumi, all are implemented in Scheme and they are receiving very few > contributions. > > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/guix-cuirass.git > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/build-coordinator.git/ > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/mumi.git/ > > > Cheers, > simon Its more about: If debbugs has issues and we dont fully control it and can make those improvements, why not something in scheme instead of sr.ht? But i could go either way. MSavoritias