From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:306:2d92::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id uGbhE33cHGVKOwEA9RJhRA:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 04 Oct 2023 05:31:09 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:306:2d92::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id uGbhE33cHGVKOwEA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 04 Oct 2023 05:31:09 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3597C387DD for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2023 05:31:09 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=BQrmGAGq; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1696390269; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=o87Y7+aHpVdm6m8zny3P/RtLV+9ZohMFcAq7vDXlEyY=; b=ZazqLDg15fTPA5Pl5H57LCGQm7oqG39RZco3wBO+CaO9s4N/GVY9Gqz4edD4Ig3HzkRHiF f+ZjV105OuVP/cTUpfsGDms78fk9YIp1u78d6hVcxDMcydwwg4tOvFwxH41CumNNfIv4zx zwHrUrG66jgf4S4+kd/6paV1Vi4y+fjuSJzBGy6GVRih6lP49bdjTOf+7VPTnztF3YX9Tv jHd+ptxi+VqQgH8f/gq1uDeFDROEJCLQmD57/uIj2MV429Icgi2IxxVkFaRfL43aAsI+Jp mucBs8yrIBKgRk0hD1p618y1C0nkKa4Df3CAsriJ+qRAFITGR5AFhH7bKi61vg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=BQrmGAGq; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1696390269; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Tcg/Ca3335ok/Gye+DvdVBIgin0TtOc14kvVOJPltx5a6G4yY36Gg2I1GgEuD/w0F2fSH6 vQhm+7ypE9bFE3vA7nXSCaSStKGjWcAq39xKnV/gFlxXdvhWSvf4UlsYNnTOa24MQgqkEA 7kCUa+lDWfYnA6QYNM/9W2WtRoZTtB3wn82+vR54AJC2EJ0EPbU3kBcpfEYJIR1MOpz1ka +gJiaAQ/U0fesXhy1mT8KAYGYh0fkKrOQghnTtNmQdfbdmn6XBNya5W4nfOpW9OqrJFq93 kReWK8nRdxzzpXLuiXg8S+NeFWZmQg89Fl3BdrR4L73zEs7XZQ3nwcXf1V6GAA== Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qnsb9-0004bm-2K; Tue, 03 Oct 2023 23:30:55 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qnsay-0004Ov-W8 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2023 23:30:45 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qnsay-0004ML-Mr for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2023 23:30:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qnsbG-0006vB-67 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2023 23:31:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#50015: Rust packages are not reproducible Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2023 03:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50015 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 50015@debbugs.gnu.org, Efraim Flashner Received: via spool by 50015-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50015.169639024323992 (code B ref 50015); Wed, 04 Oct 2023 03:31:02 +0000 Received: (at 50015) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Oct 2023 03:30:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41126 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qnsaw-0006Dv-Nv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2023 23:30:43 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-x72a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::72a]:61473) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qnsau-0005y1-NF for 50015@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2023 23:30:41 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-x72a.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-7743448d88eso116153185a.2 for <50015@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 03 Oct 2023 20:30:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1696390217; x=1696995017; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=o87Y7+aHpVdm6m8zny3P/RtLV+9ZohMFcAq7vDXlEyY=; b=BQrmGAGqj2rfF0KGPuSQNMEgFDiEhAOeXGEVA3sWQZ3v1Qzu6QNJXxslngXfTl4FY7 Keq2m0LuCuuKXXGYQaC8vhGQEp5OW0eUb476CNAMSUTXU8FGEHn5ksMBWY5BpX1ZAkDt lxcB6jBMc9GL+XMKZwYeXPC0z5ZJa1oIk+jxLy1YT2KbAmKRBS9+yG5snwRcwTrS+ZMT VKHAHQJUwmu4uOhsGV/6ibX+sGiZnTxN+oDIagiVjJvtB21W6c8aWdCcS712V7hEqxos kmgR2ku90JnzLA71DCYNGLyKH8LMfPMzbieb4lCmTKGidk4nZEiofuWN3yDoNGBv9QIj LlPg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1696390217; x=1696995017; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=o87Y7+aHpVdm6m8zny3P/RtLV+9ZohMFcAq7vDXlEyY=; b=mZk13VSgra4myCi3qZr7y3KQR4kPWc91FkTBux1hw/iM16C5xgqakHmqY25xvZb2i/ x6Ge9GzHH0Mh9dFZZ2vmEZZwFjVa/OJ4mJi+zB3NWVC3MSaiu46SgrBXoS1hX3ErXlNd sOT8FdmQ+vdtNUETkPWBJCI8HUq0jjcC6v1vuyEZ+jqbK6vg8fRfiMcrTlKaWlQl6+wh y8D8efo+PDk624Cey+BmXPEj+cVnpyMAXlqJObQZQyIGhW6LH8dBcDfASnuV6qSdw34f /CE7tfm7KMg+CurD6AJqwAoG7TuUL939KlvNHP3bnZ3z895hr3HaOir+U75RYYtc1c2Y JKxQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy1FCoKxtJSwtx7d7wBSsNY+v1Cd+xP5hE4WoTFMuu0HgKyhnK+ mKlE9QmcML21HjYsv1MLUlLIgBbkyfSKZw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHZuZNhnGwgubhtL7lRNkqHzh6ThchmYAm17HNtm3YsWqABulz13W3nRu1Kj5g2Lc7/L4hp3Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1726:b0:76c:ecef:28c with SMTP id az38-20020a05620a172600b0076cecef028cmr1372299qkb.57.1696390217463; Tue, 03 Oct 2023 20:30:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-141-24.b2b2c.ca. [66.158.141.24]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h20-20020a05620a10b400b007756736aed7sm965193qkk.106.2023.10.03.20.30.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 03 Oct 2023 20:30:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer References: <87czqjk7j6.fsf@inria.fr> <874kbvhysf.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2023 23:30:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <874kbvhysf.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?="'s message of "Thu, 12 Aug 2021 10:06:56 +0200") Message-ID: <87sf6r2hfc.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.35 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx2.migadu.com X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 3597C387DD X-Spam-Score: -4.35 X-TUID: 12SzbAUAMUrP Hello, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Hello! > > Efraim Flashner skribis: > >> I tried patching this a couple of ways, but it looks like the best >> option is going to be a 'patch-and-repack phase after 'install. the >> .crate file is really a gzip tarball, and I suspect that each time we >> run 'cargo ' the timestamp gets updated. > > So that =E2=80=98Cargo.toml=E2=80=99 file is not something taken from the= build tree? > In that case we could reset the timestamp before the tarball is > created. But otherwise yeah, patch=E2=80=99n=E2=80=99repack. A better solution would be to have cargo honor SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH, perhaps? They'd probably accept such an improvement upstream. --=20 Thanks, Maxim