all messages for Guix-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* [bug#74406] [PATCH 0/1] antlr4 package does not refer to java executable by full path
@ 2024-11-17 19:15 Rutherther via Guix-patches via
  2024-11-17 19:17 ` [bug#74405] [PATCH 1/1] gnu: antlr4: Pass full path to java in bin executable Rutherther via Guix-patches via
  2024-12-04 22:17   ` Rutherther
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rutherther via Guix-patches via @ 2024-11-17 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 74406; +Cc: Rutherther, Julien Lepiller

Hello,

this seems to me like a bug - the package antlr4 refers
to "java" in bin/antlr4 that is produced. I think it should
refer to #$icedtea/bin/java. It seems to me quite probable
this was a mistake, since there was java written multiple
times in phases, where it's available in PATH automatically.

Rutherther (1):
  gnu: antlr4: Pass full path to java in bin executable

 gnu/packages/java.scm | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)


base-commit: d108a7aac2c51f21c55cb8ea8801629a97f5242a
--
2.46.0




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [bug#74405] [PATCH 1/1] gnu: antlr4: Pass full path to java in bin executable
  2024-11-17 19:15 [bug#74406] [PATCH 0/1] antlr4 package does not refer to java executable by full path Rutherther via Guix-patches via
@ 2024-11-17 19:17 ` Rutherther via Guix-patches via
  2024-12-04 22:17   ` Rutherther
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rutherther via Guix-patches via @ 2024-11-17 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 74405; +Cc: Rutherther, Julien Lepiller

The executable outputted by antlr4 package does not
refer to full path of java, but to standalone "java".
That means the package expects java to be in PATH.
Since it's an application, requiring java to run,
it should rather refer to full path of java executable
it was built with/for.

* gnu/packages/java.scm: (antrl4)[arguments]: Change "java" in bin/antlr4 for full path

Change-Id: I311b9ec54a90fc7251eb8fcb62b232e843853e64
---
 gnu/packages/java.scm | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/java.scm b/gnu/packages/java.scm
index df57385ea7..8607b62bea 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/java.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/java.scm
@@ -8866,13 +8866,14 @@ (define-public antlr4
          (add-after 'install 'bin-install
            (lambda* (#:key inputs outputs #:allow-other-keys)
              (let ((jar (string-append (assoc-ref outputs "out") "/share/java"))
-                   (bin (string-append (assoc-ref outputs "out") "/bin")))
+                   (bin (string-append (assoc-ref outputs "out") "/bin"))
+                   (java (search-input-file inputs "bin/java")))
                (mkdir-p bin)
                (with-output-to-file (string-append bin "/antlr4")
                  (lambda _
                    (display
                      (string-append "#!" (which "sh") "\n"
-                                    "java -cp " jar "/antlr4.jar:"
+                                    java " -cp " jar "/antlr4.jar:"
                                     (string-join
                                       (apply
                                         append
-- 
2.46.0




^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [bug#74405] [PATCH 0/1] qt-build-system: Wrap with build variables to allow %outputs in arguments
@ 2024-12-04 22:17   ` Rutherther
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rutherther via Guix-patches via @ 2024-12-04 19:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 74405
  Cc: Rutherther, Rutherther, Maxim Cournoyer,
	宋文武

It is impossible to refer to %outputs in arguments like #:configure-flags
(ie. `(assoc-ref %outputs "out")` leads to unbound-variable %outputs).
I think the issue is in qt using different system than build systems such
as cmake or gnu. Since I am unsure about the reason for qt not having
the same structure, I am submitting this to guix devel for discussion,
as well as opening a patch in case this is fine to be merged. If not,
could someone please explain what the reason behind not adding
inputs and outputs is, and what is the alternative?

Regards,
Rutherther

Rutherther (1):
  guix: qt: add inputs and outputs build variables in qt-build

 guix/build-system/qt.scm | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)


base-commit: 006679d1e6ca7acea0629b4f019c8cf89cde08be
--
2.46.0




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [bug#74405] [PATCH 0/1] qt-build-system: Wrap with build variables to allow %outputs in arguments
  2024-12-04 22:17   ` Rutherther
  (?)
@ 2024-12-04 19:14   ` Rutherther via Guix-patches via
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rutherther via Guix-patches via @ 2024-12-04 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 74405


So sorry, I meant to make a new issue, but instead,
I accidentally sent it to this one thanks to mumi
being so easy to use, and not noticing I didn't switch
to a new issue. :(




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [bug#74695] [PATCH 1/1] guix: qt: add inputs and outputs build variables in qt-build
  2024-12-04 22:17   ` Rutherther
  (?)
  (?)
@ 2024-12-04 19:15   ` Rutherther via Guix-patches via
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rutherther via Guix-patches via @ 2024-12-04 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 74695
  Cc: Rutherther, Maxim Cournoyer,
	宋文武

Qt build doesn't provide build-variables of inputs and outputs,
so it's not possible to refer to %outputs in arguments of
a package that uses qt-build-system. This patch unifies
qt-build-system's behavior with other build systems like
cmake-build-system or gnu-build-system.

* guix/build-system/qt.scm (qt-build): Wrap with with-build-variables to
provide variables to arguments

Change-Id: I65853a5831ce7b5dc7ebe10807c6e61bb89cab36
---
 guix/build-system/qt.scm | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/guix/build-system/qt.scm b/guix/build-system/qt.scm
index d1f721c54e..5f9a5019ae 100644
--- a/guix/build-system/qt.scm
+++ b/guix/build-system/qt.scm
@@ -152,32 +152,34 @@ (define* (qt-build name inputs
     (with-imported-modules imported-modules
       #~(begin
           (use-modules #$@(sexp->gexp modules))
-          (qt-build #:source #+source
-                    #:system #$system
-                    #:outputs #$(outputs->gexp outputs)
-                    #:inputs #$(input-tuples->gexp inputs)
-                    #:search-paths '#$(sexp->gexp
-                                       (map search-path-specification->sexp
-                                            search-paths))
-                    #:phases #$(if (pair? phases)
-                                   (sexp->gexp phases)
-                                   phases)
-                    #:qtbase #+qtbase
-                    #:qt-wrap-excluded-outputs #$qt-wrap-excluded-outputs
-                    #:qt-wrap-excluded-inputs #$qt-wrap-excluded-inputs
-                    #:configure-flags #$configure-flags
-                    #:make-flags #$make-flags
-                    #:out-of-source? #$out-of-source?
-                    #:build-type #$build-type
-                    #:tests? #$tests?
-                    #:test-target #$test-target
-                    #:parallel-build? #$parallel-build?
-                    #:parallel-tests? #$parallel-tests?
-                    #:validate-runpath? #$validate-runpath?
-                    #:patch-shebangs? #$patch-shebangs?
-                    #:strip-binaries? #$strip-binaries?
-                    #:strip-flags #$strip-flags
-                    #:strip-directories #$strip-directories))))
+
+          #$(with-build-variables inputs outputs
+              #~(qt-build #:source #+source
+                          #:system #$system
+                          #:outputs %outputs
+                          #:inputs %build-inputs
+                          #:search-paths '#$(sexp->gexp
+                                             (map search-path-specification->sexp
+                                                  search-paths))
+                          #:phases #$(if (pair? phases)
+                                         (sexp->gexp phases)
+                                         phases)
+                          #:qtbase #+qtbase
+                          #:qt-wrap-excluded-outputs #$qt-wrap-excluded-outputs
+                          #:qt-wrap-excluded-inputs #$qt-wrap-excluded-inputs
+                          #:configure-flags #$configure-flags
+                          #:make-flags #$make-flags
+                          #:out-of-source? #$out-of-source?
+                          #:build-type #$build-type
+                          #:tests? #$tests?
+                          #:test-target #$test-target
+                          #:parallel-build? #$parallel-build?
+                          #:parallel-tests? #$parallel-tests?
+                          #:validate-runpath? #$validate-runpath?
+                          #:patch-shebangs? #$patch-shebangs?
+                          #:strip-binaries? #$strip-binaries?
+                          #:strip-flags #$strip-flags
+                          #:strip-directories #$strip-directories)))))
 
   (mlet %store-monad ((guile (package->derivation (or guile (default-guile))
                                                   system #:graft? #f)))
-- 
2.46.0




^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 0/1] qt-build-system: Wrap with build variables to allow %outputs in arguments
@ 2024-12-04 22:17   ` Rutherther
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rutherther @ 2024-12-04 22:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: guix-devel; +Cc: Rutherther

It is impossible to refer to %outputs in arguments like #:configure-flags
(ie. `(assoc-ref %outputs "out")` leads to unbound-variable %outputs).
I think the issue is in qt using different system than build systems such
as cmake or gnu. Since I am unsure about the reason for qt not having
the same structure, I am submitting this to guix devel for discussion,
as well as opening a patch in case this is fine to be merged. If not,
could someone please explain what the reason behind not adding
inputs and outputs is, and what is the alternative?

Regards,
Rutherther

Rutherther (1):
  guix: qt: add inputs and outputs build variables in qt-build

 guix/build-system/qt.scm | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)


base-commit: 006679d1e6ca7acea0629b4f019c8cf89cde08be
--
2.46.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-12-04 22:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-11-17 19:15 [bug#74406] [PATCH 0/1] antlr4 package does not refer to java executable by full path Rutherther via Guix-patches via
2024-11-17 19:17 ` [bug#74405] [PATCH 1/1] gnu: antlr4: Pass full path to java in bin executable Rutherther via Guix-patches via
2024-12-04 19:12 ` [bug#74405] [PATCH 0/1] qt-build-system: Wrap with build variables to allow %outputs in arguments Rutherther via Guix-patches via
2024-12-04 22:17   ` Rutherther
2024-12-04 19:14   ` [bug#74405] " Rutherther via Guix-patches via
2024-12-04 19:15   ` [bug#74695] [PATCH 1/1] guix: qt: add inputs and outputs build variables in qt-build Rutherther via Guix-patches via

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.