From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id UOo8KeckgGf0AAEAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 19:35:03 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id UOo8KeckgGf0AAEAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 20:35:03 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=lease-up.com header.s=2017 header.b=U2I8SQYj; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1736451303; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=Q3T0wZA1+Qnp5OZbqwFiSXeSidDSgELd4QDaLUtbgPw=; b=Wiol9J//ooroYqDcnesKrRfmjCst6jvg0jCUKBdnTHBPeAj8vVchcCMmlV4ExwYVclViTk a1+/UKU2iFCoXfju0OIYRriTnFgOyyhDAGC1CDVm8wbPjDL/Rd1XXCy+L2q2hcEUZl8QKx mDgPF56dlFC0EFyqxXdwdw27ritRXN5tGOn9wElJPntRPW68bg8OELn61apQ20zEBv3QU+ vP1JAaeQ4TyrA6Gnhwbh4y6SycCt2F/I7T6TnsV+3PddnMFrGGcOlAL3TONqzPFWK7hz9H 0q1hAnikTWsGSg28z28TbJ/jLZ0SO9LQ1XMaCSX0Ds6slTlhZsRZ2nCFe2jvrg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=lease-up.com header.s=2017 header.b=U2I8SQYj; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1736451303; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=RZyOovEpAR2UQ3QuXwSi0ghgYJyHzi+J9+hzDQWVl6kWGr95iq+6Vau+kFAd1mESZFO7xi bOtgOrAv+mShsoKvk9Ewv/r+al5EMDyHFGMao7XvJo5S0FsrbU+IT+fCvJnb5PbykISJ1d 9xp7RZCaVoDrc/D4chrPCCxFV9bxqGZPennGuD11rJQLiGY86DAlzVwuTerWDqZyd7Twub sQH3h6bAMa8UZNgU7GnxclFsJ6S/LPdRD1BO7E9CD4rtS0Fr6oryX9Q+ZX22HVr7pzGVvK 45ZM7fX+K4lO8DQzYPJSeyvfnU2wGhifjkDwjZpkiMntJGQne0wTBqdgaeHVUg== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 624E951215 for ; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 20:35:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tVyIT-0006QJ-MS; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 14:34:25 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tVyIR-0006Q2-RO for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 14:34:23 -0500 Received: from sail-ipv4.us-core.com ([208.82.101.137]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tVyIP-0003lD-Lh for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 14:34:23 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=2017; bh=v1FZJ5LjbLMRfBa O0n8niDCQH3jS5ML+PisbzIgVius=; h=date:references:in-reply-to:subject: cc:to:from; d=lease-up.com; b=U2I8SQYjzqyp8ywjIfiwedVPQjulZVVLKPGhfy7q hxYCFh2dibAFQY6vatgrcfN/mG86kiakhWWCKlUAzFmci9CLdlbhPWQwsUjMPbHdBnsbFa a1A1mzqsh4hIioi/49iCpE+98yUusO7N84M7e1tlTVSr8N55D8QkDqrvNp5c4= Received: by sail-ipv4.us-core.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id e78882a7 (TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO); Thu, 9 Jan 2025 19:34:12 +0000 (UTC) To: 45mg <45mg.writes@gmail.com> Cc: 75145@debbugs.gnu.org, guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] services: network-manager: Add extra-configuration-files field. In-Reply-To: (45mg.writes@gmail.com's message of "Thu, 9 Jan 2025 12:24:30 +0000") References: <7743f403ebf1693fc386a397e9aed1975b43f900.1735323486.git.45mg.writes@gmail.com> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.7; emacs 29.4 Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2025 11:34:12 -0800 Message-ID: <87seprdbnv.fsf@lease-up.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=208.82.101.137; envelope-from=felix.lechner@lease-up.com; helo=sail-ipv4.us-core.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Felix Lechner From: Felix Lechner via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 624E951215 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx13.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.26 X-Spam-Score: -3.26 X-TUID: w1bqtfmAnNWP Hi 45mg, On Thu, Jan 09 2025, 45mg wrote: > this patch failed to get any attention in two weeks Two weeks isn't a long time in free software projects. A more common time frame would be between one year and eighteen months. > I'm CC'ing guix-devel on this one Pings are generally frowned upon, but I also just did it yesterday. [1] Pings are usually not worth it anywhere, not just in GNU Guix. Pings are likely to be ineffective in hastening the acceptance of your patch but will almost certainly affect your social relationships negatively. > This patch allows users to specify configuration files for NetworkManager. If you require that change personally, as I suspect you do, my recommendation would be to clone the Guix repo and pull your 'guix' executable from your custom branch. For example, I have in my channels.scm a branch that I rebase periodically. [2] I pull with guix pull --allow-downgrades --disable-authentication That kind of setup totally removes the timing pressure from your contribution. It also allows you to test your patch in real life and then argue with committers solely about its merits. It's better for everybody, I think. It may leave everyone, most importantly yourself, in a happier place. Kind regards Felix [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2025-01/msg00056.html [2] https://codeberg.org/lechner/guix-config/src/branch/history/channels.scm