From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: WIP SDL packages
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 08:58:38 +0100
Message-ID: <87r4ac961d.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <528AD70C.3070406@worcester.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40923)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1VigCs-000581-3A
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 02:58:52 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1VigCm-0007w8-4y
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 02:58:46 -0500
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:47953)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1VigCl-0007vx-Ut
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 02:58:40 -0500
In-Reply-To: <528AD70C.3070406@worcester.edu> (David Thompson's message of
	"Mon, 18 Nov 2013 22:12:12 -0500")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: David Thompson <dthompson2@worcester.edu>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Hi, David,

David Thompson <dthompson2@worcester.edu> skribis:

> Attached is a work-in-progress patch that adds SDL and SDL2 packages.

Nice!

> I'm having some trouble getting the dependencies sorted out. For
> instance, pulseaudio is listed as an input but the configure script does
> not detect pulseaudio support. Both packages build successfully, but
> they are probably missing other optional dependencies.
>
> Would anyone mind taking a look and giving some feedback?

I=E2=80=99ll do it if nobody gets to it before, but you could try building =
SDL
with --keep-failed, hit C-c C-c after the configure phase, and then
check in config.log what makes it think PulseAudio is unavailable.

Hmm, actually it may be that it just lacks pkg-config as an input, no?

HTH,
Ludo=E2=80=99.