From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Emacs interface for Guix
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:34:48 +0400
Message-ID: <87r41dpwhz.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87zjg9rgih.fsf@gmail.com> <871ttlgzfl.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87vbqxqg3n.fsf@gmail.com> <87ha2fm3gk.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87r41hrdks.fsf@gmail.com> <8738dxe2jq.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87mwc4qzd5.fsf@gmail.com> <878uno9l7b.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87iomsq8fe.fsf@gmail.com> <874myb95j0.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87a983qken.fsf@gmail.com> <87k3764s1c.fsf@gnu.org>
	<8761iqr1my.fsf@gmail.com> <87zjg21k0d.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87y4vlq5h1.fsf@gmail.com> <87y4vlanq0.fsf@taylan.uni.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32982)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1X9WTJ-0003Gu-9U
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 05:35:06 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1X9WTA-0005ri-8S
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 05:34:57 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87y4vlanq0.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> (Taylan Ulrich Bayirli's message
	of "Tue, 22 Jul 2014 08:53:27 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer <taylanbayirli@gmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer (2014-07-22 10:53 +0400) wrote:

>> [...] get an object by its address (?), [...]
>
> (pointer->scm (make-pointer address))
>
> More info at (info "(guile) Foreign Variables").
>
> Warning: can lead to Scheme code that segfaults! :-)
>
> Taylan

Ludovic Court=C3=A8s (2014-07-22 12:41 +0400) wrote:

> I was going to suggest that, but yeah, a vhash is more reasonable.  :-)

Ah, that's cool, thanks for the information, guys (I'm going to stay on
vhash).

--
Alex Kost