From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH][rfc][doc] extending the contribution guidelines Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 18:55:31 +0200 Message-ID: <87r3ajascc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87lh0uamuo.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36103) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRMgn-0007MA-60 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 12:55:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRMgi-0000s2-7D for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 12:55:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87lh0uamuo.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> (ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is's message of "Thu, 21 Jul 2016 18:05:03 +0000") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: ng0 Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi! ng0 skribis: > =3D=3D=3D Ia. =3D=3D=3D > We allow any names people choose to use, what speak against > having pseudo-anonymous contributions under > email: "noname@guixsd.org", name: "Guix Contributor" in the log > messages? > In one project I participate in, some people also started to use > name: "psyc://loupsycedyglgamf.onion/~name-of-person", > email: "BM-IDwhichisalonghash" > the psyc URI is something unique where people can be reached and > so is the provided Bitmessage ID. We definitely accept contributions made with pseudonyms, and I agree it=E2=80=99s a good idea to explicitly state it in the manual. > =3D=3D II. =3D=3D > > A question on copyright assignment: We have the Guix Europe > association. Could we not use it for copyright assignments in > file headers like this, either in addition to the already > existing ones or use it exclusively? > > ;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2015, 2016 the Guix Europe association > > Why would it be a bad idea, why would it be a good idea? I agree with what Andreas wrote. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.