From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Subject: Re: update python-urwid, python-urwidtrees
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 06:45:10 -0400
Message-ID: <87r39f4vd5.fsf@netris.org>
References: <147192926319.29271.5175679554934825541@what>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46910)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mhw@netris.org>) id 1bc9E3-0007zW-5K
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 06:46:36 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mhw@netris.org>) id 1bc9Dy-0004zS-ON
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 06:46:34 -0400
Received: from world.peace.net ([50.252.239.5]:45501)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mhw@netris.org>) id 1bc9Dy-0004zN-Kk
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 06:46:30 -0400
In-Reply-To: <147192926319.29271.5175679554934825541@what> (Troy Sankey's
	message of "Tue, 23 Aug 2016 01:14:23 -0400")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Troy Sankey <sankeytms@gmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Troy Sankey <sankeytms@gmail.com> writes:

> Also throwing in a third patch to update comments in the alot package
> definition.  It's related because it's the same note as in python-urwidtrees:
> author only distributes via github, not pypi.
>
> FWIW, I'm submitting these to fix a cosmetic bug in alot.  I also did check the
> other consumer of python-urwid (khal), and it does not seem to break anything.
>
> Troy
>
> From fdc5364cce561e7a5067e0bec256899847f82a41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Troy Sankey <sankeytms@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 12:09:22 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH 3/3] gnu: alot: Fixup comments.

> From 213f3035df3ea8caa1695debfcf6ea946ff4dc01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Troy Sankey <sankeytms@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 12:08:05 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH 2/3] gnu: python-urwidtrees: Update to 1.0.2.

> From a6c47dc9631948ade8436acd42bfe898a920e9be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Troy Sankey <sankeytms@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 23:33:24 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] gnu: python-urwid: Update to 1.3.1.

Pushed, thanks! :)

     Mark