From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [UX] real names exposed
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 00:04:58 +0200
Message-ID: <87r38vjrhx.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <147266794967.23966.13712862947716543821@what>
	<20160831231110.GB18814@jasmine>
	<b38f200f5083ed65d1813e281f9e8cd0@openmailbox.org>
	<87wpiwt2qx.fsf@gnu.org> <87bn04k40m.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87poojihbm.fsf@gnu.org> <20160905220926.47e7e37b@openmailbox.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35048)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1bhkxz-0008JO-AC
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2016 18:05:12 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1bhkxx-0004p7-Dt
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2016 18:05:10 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20160905220926.47e7e37b@openmailbox.org> (Eric Bavier's message
	of "Mon, 5 Sep 2016 22:09:26 -0500")
List-Id: <help-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:help-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Help-Guix" <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Eric Bavier <ericbavier@openmailbox.org>
Cc: help-guix@gnu.org, Help-Guix <help-guix-bounces+ericbavier=openmailbox.org@gnu.org>

Eric Bavier <ericbavier@openmailbox.org> skribis:

> On Sun, 04 Sep 2016 21:41:01 +0200
> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote:
>
>> While playing with =E2=80=98wrap-program=E2=80=99, I rewrote it so creat=
e a single
>> wrapper and modify that wrapper when it exists instead of layering an
>> extra wrapper.
>>=20
>> Thoughts?  If there are no objections, I=E2=80=99d like to commit this o=
ne.
>
> Seems reasonable to me.

Pushed as b14a8385095f6672960fb8378c6578acf1ebbf8a.

Ludo=E2=80=99.