From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marius Bakke Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] gnu: Add KDE frameworkintegration. Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 19:30:29 +0100 Message-ID: <87r3647kje.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> References: <1479744699-27226-1-git-send-email-h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com> <1479744699-27226-2-git-send-email-h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com> <87k2bw923e.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <58333672.4060804@crazy-compilers.com> <87twb07kzz.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51446) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c8tMS-0006MT-HV for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 13:30:37 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c8tMO-0003Jk-FH for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 13:30:36 -0500 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:33035) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c8tMO-0003JE-53 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 13:30:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87twb07kzz.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Hartmut Goebel , guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Marius Bakke writes: > I wonder if we should seek a statement from KDE allowing the use of > GPL3+ for our packages. > > Meanwhile, the way I read it, this package should be '(gpl2 gpl3 lpgl2.0 > lgpl2.0+). I would change the comment to something like: > > ;; This is distributed under either gpl2 or gpl3, but some files are > ;; covered by other licenses. Oops, I read the copyright file wrong, I thought the top section was GPL, but it is in fact LGPL. So the license field should be '(lgpl2.0 lgpl3.0 lgpl2.0+) And the comment would be along the lines of "This package is distributed under either LGPL2 or LGPL3, but some files are explicitly LGPL2+.". It would be nice to clarify this with KDE. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJYMz1FAAoJEKKgbfKjOlT6S/0IAIjL4OLROKDm4yF0v5NF6biR L0et0ST37vgJIYdyaaRnLf1Ivb2p/QSOj2oBmGQRehMHCqeYABWa1j6fs1Drkoho wBXDqiBshVBeMpT4kdlaJKyPuk4XZZSkpSqwM+hSOCZx5W48XHKLLQephn8JSQyf z+G8PXYvazNF1nCke1ye8pfKXz1chRDvMkfC7zi1pIfUCX6w+yPUq0gV9SW7DFGx YTqXSqeMkC4UTCPKl7hpXaaQoGz+8x58KJI4Z9MXo3c7Qm/J/d291yRxSRokqpDS 6JTPQ2FxmAi6ewHg1o7iXC/sG7mP3irJODl/VO9EVT3iGLJizYFE0v8kvu9NOvY= =srs2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--