Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com> writes:

> I wonder if we should seek a statement from KDE allowing the use of
> GPL3+ for our packages.
>
> Meanwhile, the way I read it, this package should be '(gpl2 gpl3 lpgl2.0
> lgpl2.0+). I would change the comment to something like:
>
> ;; This is distributed under either gpl2 or gpl3, but some files are
> ;; covered by other licenses.

Oops, I read the copyright file wrong, I thought the top section was
GPL, but it is in fact LGPL. So the license field should be

'(lgpl2.0 lgpl3.0 lgpl2.0+)

And the comment would be along the lines of "This package is
distributed under either LGPL2 or LGPL3, but some files are explicitly
LGPL2+.".

It would be nice to clarify this with KDE.