From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: ed: Replace with 1.14.1 [fixes security issues].
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 14:07:31 +0100
Message-ID: <87r347rtv0.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20170112201353.29406-1-mbakke@fastmail.com>
	<20170112215005.GA13508@jasmine>
	<87o9zc54d8.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<20170112221723.GA20450@jasmine>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38848)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1cS1Zz-0002dU-7O
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 08:07:40 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1cS1Zu-0007bq-GA
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 08:07:39 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20170112221723.GA20450@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Thu,
	12 Jan 2017 17:17:23 -0500")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:

> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 10:56:51PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
>> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
>>=20
>> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 09:13:53PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
>> >> * gnu/packages/ed.scm (ed-1.14.1): New variable.
>> >> (ed)[replacement]: New field.
>> >
>> > Can you add a comment with a link to the bug report?
>> >
>> > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-ed/2017-01/msg00000.html
>>=20
>> Good find. I wonder, was this issue only present in the unreleased
>> 1.14.0? I can't reproduce it with the current Guix version.
>
> Good catch; I can only reproduce it with 1.14, and the ed maintainer
> points out that it was introduced in 1.14.
>
>> I'll wait and see what the response on oss-sec is. Maybe we can just
>> push the update to core-updates.
>
> I think it's fine for core-updates.

With 200 dependent packages, it could even go to =E2=80=98master=E2=80=99.

  https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg00933.html

Ludo=E2=80=99.