From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur <clement@lassieur.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Openssh service patches
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 12:47:56 +0100
Message-ID: <87r32vg1oz.fsf@lassieur.org>
References: <20170217163708.10743-1-clement@lassieur.org>
	<20170217171833.iazdehmarsnpjvdm@wasp>
	<20170217184529.3a610d81@lepiller.eu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43740)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <clement@lassieur.org>) id 1cf3Uh-0008Vf-75
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Feb 2017 06:48:03 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <clement@lassieur.org>) id 1cf3Ue-0002ay-68
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Feb 2017 06:48:03 -0500
Received: from mail.lassieur.org ([83.152.10.219]:60670)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <clement@lassieur.org>)
	id 1cf3Ud-0002Zy-VD
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Feb 2017 06:48:00 -0500
In-reply-to: <20170217184529.3a610d81@lepiller.eu>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Julien Lepiller <julien@lepiller.eu>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Julien Lepiller <julien@lepiller.eu> writes:

> I haven't applied it either, but it looks good, thank you :)
>
> Could you also document the new fields and remove the documentation for
> the old one?

Sure, here it is.  Thanks!