From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] WIP: Better support for non-grub bootloaders.
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 14:53:37 +0100
Message-ID: <87r31u668u.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20170214152834.19651-1-david@craven.ch> <87shmq6ozc.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87zigkqdjs.fsf@gmail.com> <20170317124917.GA28358@jocasta.intra>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46182)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1cpEni-0004Pd-Ce
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 09:53:47 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1cpEnh-0002Ib-LC
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 09:53:46 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20170317124917.GA28358@jocasta.intra> (John Darrington's message
	of "Fri, 17 Mar 2017 13:49:17 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: John Darrington <john@darrington.wattle.id.au>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, David Craven <david@craven.ch>

John Darrington <john@darrington.wattle.id.au> skribis:

> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 01:43:19PM +0100, Mathieu Othacehe wrote:
>=20=20=20=20=20=20
>      Hi,
>=20=20=20=20=20=20
>      > Please let me know if you don???t want to be bothered about this. =
 Problem
>      > is there???s exciting stuff in this patch series and I???d probabl=
y have a
>      > few questions for you if you want.
>=20=20=20=20=20=20
>      If we get no sign from David, I'd like to start working on this patch
>      serie, starting by rebasing it and applying Ludo proposals.
>=20=20=20=20=20=20
>      Is this ok for everybody ?
>=20=20=20=20=20=20
>
> It's fine by me.

Same here.  Thanks, Mathieu!

Ludo=E2=80=99.