From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marius Bakke Subject: Re: 02/02: gnu: e2fsprogs: Update to 1.43.5. Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 21:22:30 +0200 Message-ID: <87r2we0xah.fsf@fastmail.com> References: <20170812123239.1058.41804@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20170812123240.B1C0B20CDE@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87shgvi2uw.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43714) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dhKwt-0006Ey-H6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 15:22:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dhKwq-0003UX-Cm for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 15:22:51 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:51321) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dhKwq-0003UT-9B for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 15:22:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87shgvi2uw.fsf@netris.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Mark H Weaver writes: > Hi Marius, > > mbakke@fastmail.com (Marius Bakke) writes: > >> mbakke pushed a commit to branch master >> in repository guix. >> >> commit 3ddaa7922bdd71ff4467b95a7ed264bbc4d49975 >> Author: Marius Bakke >> Date: Sat Aug 12 14:07:41 2017 +0200 >> >> gnu: e2fsprogs: Update to 1.43.5. > > Unfortunately, this new version fails its test suite on i686. It has > done so twice in a row on Hydra: > > https://hydra.gnu.org/build/2217470 > > The armhf build hasn't yet been attempted. > > This is a serious problem for i686 users, since it's effectively > blocking them from updating their system to deploy security updates. > If the issue cannot be resolved very soon, we'll need to revert this > update. Would you like to investigate? Argh. Thanks for the heads-up. I've reverted the update while investigating. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlmR+HYACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPodXggAgSO35r6fjpuiU0YkSrW1KpAwh04X75nPSG8wFKLrFY/Tzv901qUbQKdE KnpUP5sTG7xSgwWQ9RApDHvYlKXjghqqTE46ZYE6LeujQ3Kb1J/s6hQFbgJ7rVAx jX5uvcbC1OPPc3JMTDCwDSFyca937AMojXTR0K6yegM+MM7mPJXQn/BdrCO/Z67D v7FCE0T/dF9R4a93rPZZsF2F9PMee6ZjiS59+K1Ugl4k/Y6pK2+XrRfeTOeXIMpI x03TGaWhKd//W/IFXON42OEZra/Iq6UnPYw+IP5e7KdQPTUVaIAY86yEMLdR076k 5O9lhc5dLfx4qQWunfHaI4KHoP53zw== =qPyg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--