From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#27976: install 32b xfce no gnome: collision hicolor/icon-theme.cache Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:40:12 +0200 Message-ID: <87r2w5rktf.fsf@gnu.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56490) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1djop9-0006ip-A4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 11:41:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1djop4-0003U8-Eq for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 11:41:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39343) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1djop4-0003Tf-Bb for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 11:41:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1djop4-0001WN-4w for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 11:41:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: (Paul Dufresne's message of "Sat, 5 Aug 2017 21:05:53 +0000") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Paul Dufresne Cc: 27976@debbugs.gnu.org Paul Dufresne skribis: > After having problem with adwaita-icon-them-3.24.0, (reported in other bu= g) > I decided to give a try by removing gnome service from the > list of "meta-package" to install. > > So in fact keeping 'only' XFCE. > > I tried two times, once after the adwaita problem, the other after a rebo= ot > and from scratch (except partitioning). > > The result was the same (from poorly taken notes): > ... > warning: collision encountered: > /gnu/store/7qnfb279...hicolor/icon-theme.cache > ... > warning: arbitrarily choosing 7qnfb...icons/hicolor/icons-theme.cache This is a harmless warning. > Backtrace: > In Ice-0/boot-9.scm > ... > In unknown file > gtk-in-modules-builder This looks like the real error, but unfortunately we don=E2=80=99t have eno= ugh details here to see what the failure was. It would have been helpful to see the whole backtrace or the actual =E2=80=9CERROR=E2=80=9D line, along w= ith the line that says precisely which derivation failed (though I understand it=E2=80= =99s hard to grab that info while you=E2=80=99re installing.) Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.