From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53176) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1drN1T-0006nz-BW for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 07:37:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1drN1S-0003bG-HZ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 07:37:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51932) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1drN1S-0003bA-Dx for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 07:37:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1drN1S-0000Z7-7u for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 07:37:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#28401] [PATCH 0/2] gnu: Add monero. Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <87o9qjesvl.fsf@foradis.org> <87fubtbpdn.fsf@gnu.org> <87ingpehqk.fsf@foradis.org> Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 13:36:35 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87ingpehqk.fsf@foradis.org> (Theodoros Foradis's message of "Mon, 11 Sep 2017 11:56:19 +0300") Message-ID: <87r2vda2m4.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Theodoros Foradis Cc: 28401@debbugs.gnu.org, Efraim Flashner Theodoros Foradis skribis: >> BTW, all tests pass (on x86_64), but the second test of =E2=80=9Cmonero= =E2=80=9D takes >> ages: > > Maybe we should like to disable that specific test? It does pass on time on x86_64, and supposedly it=E2=80=99s useful, so I wo= uld not disable it. However, we should keep an eye on it and check whether it takes too longer on ARM, for instance, and perhaps adjust =E2=80=98max-silent-time=E2= =80=99 accordingly. >>> As far as monero-core is concerned (the gui), I did not manage to get it >>> to build with the modular qt. Should this be added in the source as a >>> TODO item? >> >> Could you be more specific at what you tried and failed to achieve? >> Perhaps Efraim (Cc=E2=80=99d) or someone else can provide guidance. > > The README file lists the following packages for other GNU/Linux > distros: > qtbase5-dev qt5-default qtdeclarative5-dev qml-module-qtquick-controls > qml-module-qtquick-xmllistmodel qttools5-dev-tools > qml-module-qtquick-dialogs > > I tried using our: > qtbase > qtdeclarative > qtquickcontrol > qttools > qtgraphicaleffects, > with which the package won't build. How does it fail? > But I can't find the equivalent for the qml-module-... packages, except > for the qtquickcontrol one. Maybe I'm missing something? Dunno, you=E2=80=99re the expert! :-) Ludo=E2=80=99.